|
PARAZAPPER claims I made up the testimonials
on this site
|
INDEX OF ARTICLES
1. PARAZAPPER -- PART 1 -- click -- here2. PARAZAPPER -- PART 2 -- click -- here
3. DIGITAL "ZAPPERS" -- click -- here
4. DR. CLARK RESEARCH ASSOCIATION -- click -- here
5. AUTO-ZAP -- click -- here
6. HARMONIC QUAD -- click -- here
7. TERMINATOR II -- click -- here
8. SILVER TERMINATOR -- click -- here
9. CUREZONE ADMITS CORRUPTION -- click -- here
CUSTOMER EMAIL
Here is s customer email I received recently that sums up how a lot of people feel about my zapper, my work and my site -- and the competition.
Ken,
I haven't even used your product yet and I just wanted to let you know my decision making process. I saw all of that banter and back and forth on Curezone and on some of those other sites. I must hand it to you, you wouldn't back down and nobody really could match all of the features that you were offering. You concentrated on product performance while others concentrated on ease of use and other bells and whistles. Also, I liked the way that you defended yourself and the way that you fought back and went toe-to-toe. This let me know one or two things: Either you are crazy or there really is something to your Ultimate Zapper. No one in their right mind would put so much out there like you did if you really were confident about your product. Why? Because it would be too easy to rip and tear apart what you posted up. So, you have heart and some ****s to do what you do. I even saw how some of the competition changed their websites after you fired back and called them out. I even seen some try to come off like you with mini comparison charts. But, your comprehensive chart is the biggest on the net. I don't know of no other site that is willing to compare its product to all the others. It is usually a suicide mission. Yet, you went against the grain and for me that was enough to try your product. And it didn't matter whether you had some fancy return policy or not. I respect a man that can stand by his product, admit mistakes, improve, and grow. Your product will be and should be a reflection of who you are and what you represent. I'll keep you posted on my progress or come back if I have any questions.
Thanks
Keith E.
Jul. 8, 2010
1. PARAZAPPER -- PART 1
DAVID ETHEREDGE -- MISSION SELF-DESTRUCTION
Business must be bad. David Etheredge of ParaZapper has gone off the deep end --
again. He must be perturbed that I have exposed his lies about The Ultimate Zapper,
my site and my work. And he must be very upset about my exposing his deceptive and
corrupt marketing practices that you can read about on this page
and this page. Making false medical claims ended up with
him being raided by the Federal authorities. They closed down his business and closed
down his site. He is now up and running again. Maybe we should characterize it as
up and limping rather than up and running because he says he now needs to call his
lawyers if he wants to dot an "i" or cross a "t" on his site. The one exception
to his "I-need-to-call-my-lawyer" excuse is when he wants to bash The Ultimate Zapper
on his site. Then he takes the phone off the hook -- no calls taken from his lawyers
-- and uses The Ultimate Zapper as target practice with those old Smith & Wesson
twin 6-shooters of his. Bam-bam-bam -- run for cover. Those bullets are really starting
to fly. Darn it -- a ricochet. He just hit himself in the foot again.
In order to occupy himself productively, David Etheredge has created a "bash-The-Ultimate-Zapper"
page on his site that you can
read here. He says The Ultimate Zapper is "not so ultimate" and that it
has "the cheapest hobby level parts". I guess that explains why I offer a 3-month
trial and a lifetime warranty -- which no other zapper maker offers. And I guess
that explains why I have a return rate of 1%. The Ultimate Zapper's effectiveness
is backed by 300 testimonials that you can read in The Archive.
There are many more to come. David Etheredge has 9 testimonials on his site. By
calling me a liar David Etheredge is, in effect, also calling the thousands of satified
users of The Utlimate Zapper and those who have submitted unsolicited testimonials
liars, as well as the many doctors and other practitioners using The Ultimate Zapper
successfully in hospitals and clinics all over the world -- documented in the Testimonial
Archive -- for malaria, HIV and many othe conditions.
If The Ultimate Zapper is "not so ultimate" and is made with "the cheapest hobby
level parts" then how the heck is it doing all the amazing things that you can read
about in the Testimonial Archive? I posed this question to David Etheredge years
ago. He has yet to answer it -- except by repeating the same lies he has always
repeated about The Ultimate Zapper. How can he possibly explain all this? He doesn't
even attempt to. He simple ignores the facts in favor of self-serving fiction. He
is a jealous competitor who cannot tolerate the fact that thousands of zapper sales
have drifted away from his ParaZapper to The Ultimate Zapper. People are voting
with their feet and he is not pleased about it at all. The Ultimate Zapper is called
The Ultimate Zapper for a very good reason.
The photo of the inside of The Ultimate Zapper that he shows on his site looks like one of my 1996 prototypes -- more deceptive marketing by David Etheredge. One cannot expect anything else from him. It is true that The Ultimate Zapper does not have a printed circuit board like ParaZapper but David Etheredge completely misrepresents this on his site. Each Ultimate Zapper is hand-made and hard-wired for the highest possible reliability -- by expert electronic technicians. The Ultimate Zapper is not machine made. Machine made boards are much cheaper but produce an inferior end product. The high temperatures that machined boards are subjected to degrade quality. To hand load a board is very labor intensive. Hand-made zappers have much higher production costs. Years ago I rejected the idea of using cheap printed-circuit-boards -- like those found in ParaZapper -- in favor of high quality, hand-made production. Printed circuit boards are not only inferior they are also prone to falure. The Ultimate Zapper never fails. It is the most reliable zapper available. In fact, many high-end audio companies are taking the very same approach today that I am -- hand-made and hard-wired -- and they are producing some of the highest quality and most reliable audio products in the world -- companies like APL and Merlin Music and Audio Magic that produce hand-made world-class products -- like The Ultimate Zapper. These companies are taking more time to produce the very highest quality products -- like my production team does. The Ultimate Zapper has a total return rate (unrelated to technical faults) of less than 1% -- the lowest advertised return rate of any zapper in the world. Cheap "hobby-level" parts? I would certainly be inviting big trouble in the return department if this were true. Of course, it is completely false -- as the extremely low return rate shows -- that is not based on technical problems that are virtually non-existant.
The New Model SE is also made with high quality all lead-free components which makes
it the most environmentally friendly zapper on the market and that make it RoHS
compliant for shipment to California and the EU (the European Union). The New Model
SE uses a special (and very expensive) silver alloy solder that gives it 40% higher
conductivity than the original Ultimate Zapper. Its lead-free silver alloy solder
is the most expensive on the market and also has superior adhesive quality compared
to leaded solder. The New Model SE is shipped with the most expensive solid copper
clips on the market -- not the cheap nickel plated steel clips that most zappers
have that corrode, rust and break off easily. The Ultimate Zapper has the highest
quality, most expensive and most reliable toggle switch of any zapper on the market.
The box that contains its components is the very highest quality industrial grade
ABS plastic box that money can buy. I offer a lifetime warranty because the New
Model SE is the highest quality zapper on the market. I back up The Ultimate Zapper
with the best Satisfaction Guaranteed package of any zapper in the world
that includes a 3-month trial offer. Compare the New Model SE to ParaZapper and
to the 27 other popular zappers on the market in 5 Zapper Comparison
Charts. Look at ParaZapper's limited 30-day return policy with his punitive
60% penalty and his limited 3-year warranty -- versus The Ultimate Zapper's 3-month
trial period with a 15% return fee and my lifetime warranty.
David Etheredge has the nerve to accuse me of "profiteering off [my] customers".
First of all, feature for feature The Ultimate Zapper offers better value than any
other zapper in the world, hands down, including any of his ParaZapper models. Just
have a look at the 5 Zapper Comparison Charts and you'll see that this is true.
Also, regarding the despicable claim of "profiteering", most of the work I do is
helping people with serious illnesses -- like MS and Crohn's disease that I recovered
from in the 1990s. I do this work free of charge. I work 10 hours a day 365 days
a year. Also, to help people who are in financial need, I offer more discounts to
customers than any other zapper maker -- personal discounts upon request as well
as my special Introductory Offer for the New Model SE and the $20.00 discount on
My Recovery Protocol that comes with a free copy of The Ultimate Liver
Cleanse. I also offer generous additional distributor and referral discount
programs. I have a worldwide network of distributors.
It is that it is more expensive to produce one Ultimate Zapper than it is to produce
any ParaZapper model because hard-wiring takes extra time and care and quality control.
As well, The Ultimate Zapper contains some very expensive parts -- contrary to the
lies that David Etheredge publishes on his site and that he would like people to
believe. The actual cost of producing The Ultimate Zapper is about twice what David
Etheredge says I should sell The Ultimate Zapper for. So the only conclusion I can
come to is that he would like me to sell The Ultimate Zapper below cost so that
I would be forced to go out of business -- and no longer be a thorn in his side.
David Etheredge will have to dream on. My mother just passed away at age 97. God
rest her soul. I will continue to be a thorn in David Etheredge's side for as long
as I am able -- which may be for quite a while -- much to his chagrin I am sure.
I not only have good genes, I also have the patience of Job. I have not taken a
day off since 1999. David Etheredge is going to need a lot of stamina.
More lies from David Etheredge. He states that "His zapper [meaning The Ultimate
Zapper] does include a [he means "an"] AC wall adapter that does not meet the IEC
60601 specifications for contact with humans. This could possible [he means "possibly"]
be lethal in some cases." David Etheredge has been lying and fear-mongering about
The Ultimate Zapper for many years [-- with his typical smattering of poor spelling
and grammar. If he can't even compose the text on his site in correct English he
should at least hire a proof-reader, IMHO. The sloppiness that characterizes his
site is the same trait that got him into trouble with the Feds in 2003. He is more
than sloppy about his business practices. I characterize his business practices
as deceptive and corrupt and I document my statements on this page and on the links
to other pages on this site.]
The fact is that there has never been a single failure of The Ultimate Zapper's
AC adapter in 14 years -- and there never will be because it is UL and CSA approved
and contains fail-safe double insulation. David Etheredge's lies about the AC adapter
were refuted at #16 on the FAQ Page on my site years
ago -- which he has chosen to ignore. His lies were not only refuted by me but also
by an electronics expert whose opinion I did not solicit and who I do not even know.
This has not prevented David Etheredge from continuing to repeat those very same
lies year after year. I guess he figures if he repeats them often enough and for
long enough then people will start to believe them. The best he can expect is to
end up fooling some of the people some of the time.
More lies from David Etheredge. David Etheredge attempts to cast doubt about The
Ultimate Zapper's powerful electroporation effect and its powerful blood electrification
effect. His statements show that he has no idea what he is talking about. The testimonials
sent in by people who have used The Ultimate Zapper for both blood electrification
and electroporation completely refute David Etheredge's assertions. They prove the
exact opposite of what he states. Quoting Bob Beck or Dr. Hulda Clark sounds impressive
-- until you realize they made glaring errors in their research. It is obvious that
they did not know everything. Quoting false statements made by "authorities" is
one of the rabbits David Etheredge pulls out of his hat. He may think he is David
Copperfield -- but he is just the same old David Etheredge.
More lies from David Etheredge. I note that David Etheredge has tried to "massage"
the oscilloscope views on the page he has "dedicated" to The Ultimate Zapper by
quoting Dr. Hulda Clark. The only problem is that Dr. Clark was wrong when she stated
that a spike in the square wave has the effect of "sustaining pathogen life". In
fact, I have yet to read any detailed scientific description of this or any proof
of this from anywhere in the world -- and David Etheredge provides no evidence whatsoever
to support this statement. Quoting Dr. Clark does not make this statement true.
In fact, it is not true. Dr. Clark was wrong about many things and this is one of
the things that she was definitely wrong about. Dr. Clark was a great innovator
but she was not perfect and her research was not perfect.
The fact is that a short spike below the zero line is normal. In fact, there is a short spike at the top and bottom of every zapper wave produced by every zapper from every zapper maker including, ironically, ParaZapper's own zapper wave that you can see below. Here is the information from my top production expert regarding this:
"Hi Ken,
Here is a picture off the ParaZapper website. Notice that his zapper also has an
upward spike at the beginnnig and a downward spike at the end of each cycle. I have
also noticed this on other square waves that I have measured. It must be a common
occurance. I notice too that under load, his zappers' voltage drops quite a bit,
unlike ours ...". The drop in voltage with ParaZapper translates into diminished
therapeutic effectiveness -- from an already weak zapper as the
Comparison Charts show.
Here is David Etheredge's oscilloscope photo of ParaZapper's wave from his own site:
FROM THE PARAZAPPER SITE
THE PARAZAPPER WAVE
CLEARLY SHOWS THE SPIKE AT THE
TOP AND THE BOTTOM OF THE WAVE
The Ultimate Irony is that while the ParaZapper spikes may diminish the therapeutic
effectiveness of its already weak wave form the short spikes at the top and the
bottom of The Ultimate Zapper's wave do not diminish its powerful therapeutic effects
at all because its wave form is very, very powerful -- as thousands of users know
-- to the probable chagrin of David Etheredge. The difference between the ParaZapper
wave and The Ultimate Zapper wave is clearly explained on the Home
Page. The Ultimate Zapper New Model SE is the most powerful and effective
zapper available. It is 40% more powerful than the original Ultimate Zapper. This
may turn out to be The Ultimate Thorn in the side of David Etheredge.
More lies from David Etheredge. On his "bash-The-Ultimate-Zapper" page David Etheredge
states: "This zapper [The Ultimate Zapper] should not sell for more than $45 or
$50 US. [Well, I'm sure David Etheredge would be very happy if I sold The Ultimate
Zapper well below cost.] For that price, we give you far better quality." Say again?
Far better quality? Have a look at the 5 Zapper Comparison Charts
that compare 29 popular zappers -- including ParaZapper -- using the 11 criteria
that make zappers effective. Have a look at the ParaZapper wave and compare it to
The Ultimate Zapper's wave on the Home Page. Then draw
your own conclusions about the "far better quality" of the ParaZapper -- that has
only 3 of the 11 features while The Ultimate Zapper has all 11 features, not to
mention ParaZapper's top models are more expensive than The Ultimate Zapper and
they also have only 3 features. "Far better quality" because of a printed circuit
board? Well, my name is Eleanor Roosevelt.
More lies from David Etheredge. One of David Etheredge's most obvious recent lies
is his statement that The Ultimate Zapper has no label. With all due respect, I
think he needs to make an appointment with his eye doctor. He can't see the photo
of the label on The Ultimate Zapper's box at the top of the Home
Page? OK, let's go nice and slow, David. First, cover your left eye. David
Etheredge will apparently go to any lengths to discredit The Ultimate Zapper --
even if that means lying. Ironically, his obsession with trying to discredit The
Ultimate Zapper -- at any cost -- only ends up with him discrediting himself. What
goes around comes around. "As Ye Sow, So Shall Ye Reap." (Galatians 6:7)
I have been helping people recover from serious conditions, including so-called
incurable diseases, for 14 years and I will continue to do so in spite of the unethical
and often despicable marketing tactics of David Etheredge of ParaZapper that I expose
on this page and other pages on this site. I recovered from paralysis with Multiple
Sclerosis in 1989 and I nearly died from Crohn's disease in 1994. It took nearly
7 years for me to recover my health. How many incurable diseases has David Etheredge
overcome? None. He dedicated his life to selling zappers. I dedicated my life to
helping others. I have over 30 "pages" on my site devoted to serious health issues
and they comprise nearly 1000 book pages. David Etheredge's ParaZapper site is basically
an order page and nothing more. He actually has a number of "mirror sites" that
are also merely order pages.
The greatest satisfaction I have had over the years is that I have succeeded in
helping many people recover from a wide variety of very serious conditions. With
God's help I will be able to continue to do so. I have received the gratitude of
countless people over the past 14 years. Jealous competitors like David Etheredge
only strengthen my resolve to continue my work. David Etheredge has once again exposed
himself as the unscrupulous character that he is -- for everyone to see -- the same
person that I have so accurately been depicting on various pages on this site for
many years. I have been applauded for doing so by many of the visitors to this site.
David Etheredge has a bad habit of shooting himself in the foot. He must think people
are damn fools. I have a secret for him. They aren't.
2. PARAZAPPER -- PART 2
ParaZapper is a dual zapper. It requires zapping 4 times longer than The Ultimate Zapper to get any results at all (that means over 4 hours a day) because it has a very weak formula. The Charts show it has only 3 of the 11 features that make zappers effective. The following testimonial is from a third party who posted his comments about ParaZapper on Curezone.
FROM CUREZONE
From http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=653103
"... I have seen absolutely nothing in the [ParaZapper] specs. that makes it anything more than the average zapper ... There is nothing in the design ... that puts it anywhere above the original Clark zapper built in a shoebox!"
Darkgatherer, Dec. 7, 2005
BETTER THAN THE MOST POWERFUL?
REALLY?
David Etheredge recently conceded "... The Ultimate Zapper ... may be the most powerful single frequency zapper" in the world. However, he says ParaZapper's 2 frequencies are "better". He offers "survey results" as proof but those "results" do not mention frequency. He has consistently refused to publish the actual surveys when asked to do so by Curezone readers. I see a smoking gun going back into the holster. He offers 9 testimonials as proof for ParaZapper's effectiveness but none mention frequency. The longest is about zapping his own pet fish.
No dual maker has ever produced proof that 2 frequencies are better than 1 low frequency -- because there is no proof. In fact, in spite of his claims, David Etheredge has never offered a shred of evidence to show that his 3-feature ParaZapper is even in the same ballpark as the 11-feature Ultimate Zapper.
HIS ZAPPER HAS IT
BUT IT MAKES NO DIFFERENCE
I find it highly ironic that one of The Ultimate Zapper's 11 feature that makes a big difference regarding its effectiveness, the stabilized wave, is denigrated by David Etheredge -- but he also offers it as a feature in his zappers! The reason he denigrates the stabilized wave is that ParaZapper is so feature-weak that it cannot maximize the power of the stabilized wave since it lacks the synergy of the The Ultimate Zapper's other 10 featrues. Here is what David Etheredge has to say about the stabilized wave: It makes no difference but I have incorporated it into the ParaZapper anyway.
In other words, David Etheredge goes to all the trouble of incorporating a stabilized wave into his zappers -- then turns right around and disclaims its effectiveness. I find this absurd. Why go to the trouble and expense of incorporating a feature into your product that you subsequently deny has any benefit -- except a "placebo" effect? This makes absolutely no sense at all -- except in a different context. I believe that David Etheredge went to all the trouble of incorporating a stabilized wave in his zapper -- and then disclaiming its effectiveness -- for competitive reasons. After reading about the effectiveness of the stabilized wave in The Ultimate Zapper on my site he wanted to discourage people from considering this feature seriously -- at least in The Ultimate Zapper. Simply ignoring the issue would show weakness so his convoluted approach was to incorporate it in his zappers -- with no visual proof, incidentally -- and then deny its effectiveness. What he is actually saying is "I tried it, it doesn't work, but it's in my zapper too." That's telling people "For those who think a stabilized wave is an important feature they can take advantage of its ineffectiveness in the ParaZapper."
STATEMENT -- THEN DENIAL
A PATTERN OF DECEPTION
David Etheredge's statements about the stabilized wave -- and the convoluted logic of his denial -- come from the same person who says that I made up the 300 testimonials on my site. In typical fashion he offers 9 testimonials on this site - a meager offering -- then he denies their reliability and calles them misleading and "one-sided". I have never heard of a 2-sided testimonial. One again, David Etheredge presents a positive attribute then denies it. The reason is in this case is obvious. He cannot ignore the 300 testimonials on my site so he tries to down-play their importance. After his denial he then implies that he has a lot more testimonials in the wings waiting to be published -- it is only his lawyers who are preventing him from doing so! Does all this sound familiar? This contradictory flip-flop technique is in evidence all over David Etheredge's site and in his postings on Curezone. I believe one gets a good insight into David Etheredge and his marketing practices by looking at this technique. You may want to read the section below about Kevin Trudeau for insight into another example of its use in his promotinal statements. The pattern of deception that emerges time and again in his writings -- affirmation then denial -- is very clear. If he were honest and straightforward he would not include a feature in his zappers then subsequently state it offers no benefit and he would not include testimonials on his site then subsequently state they have no value. He would simply not offer the feature and not publish any testimonials. There is a clear pattern of intent to deceive. His use of this technique allows David Etheredge to have one leg on each side of every important issue -- which enables him to stand on either side of the fence or, more accurately, on both sides of every important fence at the same time. Ambivalence is very convenient. But it can be very confusing to those who are not wise to the game.
A JEALOUS COMPETITOR
WITH EYES FOCUSSED ON SALES
The bottom line is that David Etheredge has shown on his site and on the Curezone forums that he is cunning competitor. He likes to boast that he is #1 in zapper sales -- to which I have responded that he is welcome to the #1 spot. (How he arrived at the conclusion that he is #1 in zapper sales is actually a mystery since I doubt that any competitor has provided him with their sales figures.) I have responded to him that I could not care less if I am #17 in sales. After my near-death experiences with Multiple Sclerosis and Crohn's disease my prime motivation has been to try to help people. I think that is obvious from looking over my site. David Etheredge claims to be a helper. The only problem is how he demonstrates this to people. He uses the name of Kevin Trudeau, a convicted larcenist -- with whom he is connected -- to promote his products. And he uses Curezone which he has admitted is in collusion with -- in a corrupt scheme. More about this below. In my opinion, David Etheredge will do just about anything to boost sales. In yet another deceptive ploy he uses a magazine article that made a passing mention of his zapper as proof that ParaZapper is part of a miraculous cure for Multiple Sclerosis -- a preposterous claim. This is just one of many claims that he has unabashedly made over the years with no proof whatsoever for their veracity. No wonder his business was shut down by the FDA in 2006 for illegal marketing. After a judicial warning he was allowed to re-open.
TAKE YOUR TIME
AND COMPARE ZAPPERS
David Etheredge says "be sure you buy a dual". I say "be very careful, compare features before you decide, and examine very carefully what each maker says. Also, have a look at each maker's returns policy." A good place to start is The Charts that compare the 29 most popular zappers using the 11 features that make zappers effective. Have a look at their returns policies of the zapper makers that are included in The Charts. ParaZapper's returns policy is clearly punitive. He offers a 10-day trial followed by a 60% return penalty after 14 days. Here is a quote from the ParaZapper site:
"... returned units MUST be postmarked by the 11th day or there may be additional charges. Units that are not postmarked by the 11th day may be subject to a re-stocking charge fo [his spelling error, he means "of"] 25 % for 11 to 14 days and 60 % for those that exceed 14 days."
David Etheredge states that he inspects postmarks to see if returns are posted after day 10. Then, in typical fashion, he turns around and says that his returns policy is just there to scare people. It is a scary policy so I imagine he has had success with it. My returns policy is not a scare tactic. I give customers 3 to 4 months to try out The Ultimate Zapper. I don't inspect postmarks for returns. David Etheredge says "Be sure you buy a dual." I think that a better idea is to shop around, get as much information as possible, compare zappers and take your time.
A CLEAR PATTERN
OF UNETHICAL MARKETING PRACTICES
Curezone posters have noted that David Etheredge indulges in unethical marketing practices to promote his ParaZapper. His strategy includes using Dr. Clark's name prominently to promote his Hulda Clark Zappers. Dr. Clark states clearly on her website " ... I do not endorse any manufacturer."
Sadly, David Etheredge goes downhill from there. He recently declared on Curezone that I made up the 300 testimonials on my site. In response to this preposterous statement which is an obvious attempt to discredit his strongest competitor I think it's fair to invite everyone to read on This Page about his misleading medical claims, what Curezone posters think about his marketing practices and the 2006 Federal judicial warning against him for illegal marketing. The following Curezone testimonial submitted by a third party is direct and to the point.
FROM CUREZONE
From http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1261256
"I would read all of ParaZapper's posts with a grain of salt. I have tried Ken Presner's Ultimate Zapper and found it to be worth every penny (even with the courier cost, as I have ordered it to a country with less than reliable mail). The advice on his site and testimonials were priceless. Give it up, ParaZapper, admit that you can't compete intellectually, monetarily or by reputation against the Ultimate Zapper site and all it stands for."
Vietnam, Sept. 19, 2008.
No dual zapper maker has ever produced any proof that 2 frequencies are better than 1 low frequency -- because there is none. Dr. Hulda Clark's research was based on the principle of a single frequency. That research is still valid today. ParaZapper is not unique in claiming that 2 frequencies are better than 1. This unsupported claim is used as a marketing tool by all makers of dual zappers. To make his claim appear more credible ParaZapper exploits Dr. Clark's name. He calls his zapper a "Hulda Clark zapper". He is not the only maker who uses Dr. Clark's name to promote sales. Many makers who market weak zappers use Dr. Clark's name.
USING DR. CLARK'S NAME
WITHOUT HER CONSENT
David Etheredge of ParaZapper uses "Hulda Clark zapper" liberally on his site to promote his zappers. But Dr. Clark states on her own site that she does not give any maker permission to use her name and does not endorse any maker or any product. This has not deterred David Etheredge from using her name. He has never received Dr. Clark's permission to use her name -- and he even contradicts himself (in typical fashion) on Curezone by stating he never uses anyone's name on his site without their permission! Since I started talking about this he has started to remove references to Dr. Clark's name from his home page, shifting her name to other pages on his site to make his exploitation of Dr. Clark a bit less visible.
THE ULTIMATE ZAPPER
STANDS ON ITS OWN MERITS
I have great respect for Dr. Hulda Clark. She is a courageous pioneer and a groundbreaking researcher -- although I do not think her methodology is rigorous enough. I pay tribute to her on the Dr. Clark Page. But I do not use her name to promote The Ultimate Zapper as you can see by reading my site. I refer to her only when using short quotes from her site and when quoting her research. Dr. Clark is not affiliated with me and has not approved or endorsed The Ultimate Zapper. It stands on its own merits and has done so since 1996.
THE PHYSICS OF DUAL ZAPPERS
TELLS THE STORY
The reality of why dual zappers are not more effective than a single low-frequency zapper is that dual zapper physics show that the lower frequency is the one that does the work of killing the parasites. The higher frequency adds nothing to the effectiveness of the lower frewuency -- which is why many zapper makes have shifted to a single low frequency. In fact, Dr. Clark discovered the superiority of low frequencies years ago. But because her original zapper research work was based on a single high frequency she still uses the high frequency zapper in her clinic -- to maintain the continuity of her research results. Makers of high frequency zappers add a low frequency because they know low frequencies are superior. They then call their zappers "dual zappers" which they then market as "better". When they add a low frequency to their zapper, dual zappers do become better than high frequency zappers -- but not because they have 2 frequencies. In any case, the fact is they don't come close to the power of The Ultimate Zapper, as The Charts show, since their over-all formulas are feature-weak compared to The Ultimate Zapper's unique 11-feature formula that includes a single low frequency.
300 FALSE TESTIMONIALS?
REALLY?
On Curezone David Etheredge has repeatedly attempted to discredit The Ultimate Zapper, my website, my e-books and the work I have been doing to help people for the past 13 years. It is clear that he will say anything to try to discredit me, and other competitors as well. I take sales away from ParaZapper and David Etheredge is underhanded and clearly dishonest in how he responds to the challenge. I discuss his unethical business practices at The Competition Part 1. Below I describe the latest in a series of attempts by David Etheredge to discredit me.
Every one of the 300 testimonials on my site is cut and pasted word for word from an unsolicited testimonial sent in by a customer or from a submission made to Curezone or another forum. Period.
In early 2008 I discovered that David Etheredge had posted on Curezone that I made up all the testimonials on my site. According to him, those who email testimonials to me -- and, presumably, those who post testimonials in favor of The Ultimate Zapper on Curezone -- never submitted them. I think David Etheredge's problem is the testimonials on my site are so amazing that he cannot admit to himself that they were produced by the zapper of a competitor who he has been trying to discredit for years -- and who, ironically, has fewer professional credentials than he has. I think that ego is part of the equation.
I have being running an honest business since 1996. That's the only kind of business I know how to run. I hate being called a liar. After I replied in no uncertain terms to David Etheredge's off-the-wall posting on Curezone about the testimonials on my site he changed his tune and revised his statement. He said some of the testimonials may be true. Then he revised it a thrid time saying that he never claimed the testimonials on my site were made up. In typical fashion, he ended up reversing himself completely. The fact is that the 300 testimonials on my site pose a real problem for David Etheredge not only because they are amazing but because he has only 9 testimonials on his own site, 3 of which are one-liners. His longest testimonial is about zapping his own pet fish. I'm not joking. If that's the most important testimonial he has then ParaZapper and David Etheredge are in trouble. David Etheredge claims that he is hamstrung by his lawyers. So you mean to say there is a serious risk of his being thrown in jail if he substituted 9 really impressive testimonials for the 9 unremarkable stories now on his site? I don't believe that for one second.
I find David Etheredge's attitude to testimonials extremely strange. It is a mystery to me why he has any testimonials at all on his site. He says on his site and on Curezone that testimonials are unreliable and misleading, including his own testimonials, because they are "one-sided". Then he implies that he has a lot more testimonials in the wings waiting to be published and that it is only his lawyers who are preventing him from doing so. In typical fashion, his statements are completely contradictory. What he is saying, in effect, is "testimonials are no good, but just wait. Once my lawyers give me the go-ahead there will be a lot more of them on my site. In the meantime, here are 9 testimonials, just to peak your interest. The most interesting one is about zapping my pet fish." Pet fish?
The nonsense he writes about testimonials being "one-sided" is the talk of an opportunist who wants to be on both sides of the issue -- as usual -- so that he can choose whichever side is to his advantage at any given point in time. On the one hand David Etheredge can be free to criticize me for posting 300 testimonials on my site -- The Ultimate Zapper site has the largest testimonial archive in the zapper business. On the other hand he can take the other side of the issue by hinting he himself has a lot of testimonials in the wings just waiting to be published. But why even publish 9 testimonials and why even hint at other testimonials in the wings if they are all unreliable, misleading and "one-sided"? David Etheredge doesn't explain this obvious contradiction.
From http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1261256
"I would read all of ParaZapper's posts with a grain of salt. I have tried Ken Presner's Ultimate Zapper and found it to be worth every penny (even with the courier cost, as I have ordered it to a country with less than reliable mail). The advice on his site and testimonials were priceless. Give it up, ParaZapper, admit that you can't compete intellectually, monetarily or by reputation against the Ultimate Zapper site and all it stands for."
This Curezone poster (Darkgatherer) hits the nail on the Head:
From http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=653181
"In one breath you say "we feel that testimonials are not a reliable source of information
as they are one-sided. I have never seen a site that published a negative testimonial,
but I can guarantee that they exist, even for the best products such as penicillin
and aspirin."
"... in the next you say "We tell them what other customers tell us about what does
work and what does not work when it comes to zapping."
"... Followed later by "The CCa is only available from ParaZapper and it produces
a distintively noticable difference in results according to our users."
"Not according to any independent studies but "according to our users" even though
you just stated that testimonials are unreliable."
"Now, either you don't except (sic) testimonials as reliable or you base your statements
on them, which is it? I think the hypocrisy is yours alone."
If the testimonials on the ParaZapper website are unreliable and misleading then, presumably, David Etheredge's whole website is unreliable and misleading because it is also "one-sided". This logic somehow eludes him. In fact, David Etheredge's ParaZapper website IS unreliable and misleading, not because it is "one-sided" but because the information on his it is inaccurate and misleading, because he makes false medical claims and because he indulges in blatantly unethical marketing practices which I discuss further at The Competition Part 1.
David Etheredge claims he has never seen a negative testimonial on any site. Well, quite a few negative testimonials have been posted on Curezone about David Etheredge regarding his "research", his ParaZapper, his website, his "ambulance chasing" on Curezone, how he does business and how naive he was concerning the FDA raid that closed him down in 2006. Here are a few exerpts from those postings with the reference links provided. These postings do not include my own 7 postings on Curezone which consist of discussions with David Etheredge. They are available for viewing at The Competition Part 1 along with a discussion of 7 additional issues involving David Etheredge and his ParaZapper site.
From http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=653103
"Parazapper, anyone truly concerned about the health of people would not engage in taking shots at others in order to sell a product. Attempting to always belittle every other zapper that is even brought up in discussion is a sad statement ... You always say that the Parazapper is not the average zapper and I was interested to find out what made it better and I have seen absolutely nothing in the specs. that make it anything more than the average zapper."
From http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=653181
" ... A few sentences before this you [ParaZapper] said ...
"As for Ken Presner's Ultimate Zapper (which I tried with a 9v battery) I have not complained about it. I do not like it plugged into the wall though."
"In the same sentence as saying you have not complained about it you come out and complain about it. A properly engineered product that is plugged into the wall has not been shown to be more dangerous or ineffective than using a 9 volt battery but you have to take every opportunity to take shots at any other products in order to make the Parazapper appear superior."
"Well if you are spending that much time trying to find improvements [for ParaZappers] then it truly has not been a very fruitful search because there have not been any major improvements ... I was open to using the Parazapper when I first came on this site but after seeing your sleazy methods and your blatantly unsupported statements, I wouldn't spend one cent on the Parazapper products ... I see nothing that makes it superior ... but the form of ambulance chasing that you engage in on this site reflects very poorly on the company and its product. If I were your employer you would be out on your ass ... "
From : http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=654499
"Vtool: I agree ... that the information that ParaZapper has posted is incorrect.
However, is ParaZapper really and intentionally lying to people or is he innocently
misinformed? ... You original post in huge BIG LETTERS suggests that he is intentionally
deceiving people and I don't think this is the case, entirely."
[Ken Presner: Note that this poster tacks the word "entirely" on the end, implying
that David Etheredge is intentionally deceiving people, to one extent or another.]
From : http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=652645
"... I applaud your attempt to do scientific testing but the protozoa test is completely
meaningless ... Parazapper I have to say that we are allies in our belief that zappers
are important but I have seen absolutely nothing in your technical data or in the
build or design of the Parazapper (including the frequency) that would show that
it reaches the blood stream or other difficult to reach cavities. The testimonials
of customers do not provide any objective evidence of the depth to which it reaches."
From : http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=654149
" ... [ParaZapper,] you claim you have research, yet you don't own even an fscan.
What do you use, a microscope? Do you use a Syncrometer??? If so, you'd have to
own the anatomy slides, and should KNOW this is a VALID and EFFECTIVE methodology.
The more you talk, the more I question your "research". http://www.drloyd.com/syncrometer.pdf
"Michael Forrest, as you stated, violated an agreement that he entered into with
the Feds, is that correct? Now you ask me if he used "Bye Bye Big Brother"? Come
on Parazapper, you KNOW the answer to this question, just like you KNEW about the
license needed to use investigative products, as your January 24th post in the Radionics
Device Forum PROVES. However, I think you can agree that ASSET protection is paramount
in such a situation - because the FIRST thing they have done is seize your stuff
... and they can do the same with ALL your assets in some cases ... including bank
accounts, etc."
From Curezone.com (sorry, still looking for the link, to
be posted shortly):
"You are one heck of a naive dude [ParaZapper]. You make outlandish claims then
you expect the FDA to send you a warning letter? You don't know the history of the
FDA raiding other "alternative" medical pushers for making claims and doing things
the FDA might consider against their wishes? You claim innocence of the past? The
only place you will get preferential treatment is on the forums where you have been
mesmerized by your own status and think this applies to the world outside the forums."
From http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=654592
"How funny! When I hit the "disagree" button on Parazapper's post, it won't work!
When I hit the "agree" button with vtool's post, it does work! Gees ... Just how
many hundreds or thousands of dollars did ole' Parazapper "donate" to the "nonprofit"
Curezone? ... Curezone has one h*ll of a marketing potential via these forums, now
doesn't it?"
From http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=654032
"... Here's Parazapper's 1/24/2006 post to the Radionics Forum on the matter, which
HE tells us HE KNEW ... If he doesn't know about how to properly apply for licenses
which HE POSTS about, then a week or two later GETS BUSTED over ... geez ..."
CREATING THE IMPRESSION
OF HELPING PEOPLE
I recovered from MS after a 7-year battle. David Etheredge never had MS. The ParaZapper site used to have an MS page with so-called helpful information about MS. David Etheredge deleted the information about MS from his site after reading my comments on Curezone about them. Under the guise of helping people he uses Curezone to promote ParaZapper. He always signs off his postings with his commercial name, ParaZapper.
The Curezone forum states the forum cannot be used for commercial purposes. David Etheredge is the only person on the forum allowed to sign off using a commercial name. He states that he intends to use the forum to "plug" his ParaZapper. He does far more than that. And the forum's moderator allows him to do so, making a mockery of the forum's "official" rules. The moderator is in collusion with David Etheredge to allow him to use the forum for commercial purposes. When I posted a series of clear and direct questions to the moderator about the forum's rules I was met with complete silence. There are reports that David Etheredge has donated a large sum of money to the "non-profit" Curezone forum that allows him to profit handsomely from using the forum for his commercial purposes. Many people have sent me emails about Curezone. Here is a typical one.
"Hi Mr. Presner,
Just wanted to let you know that the Ultimate Zapper I ordered arrived here just fine. I've been using it daily for a week now (started on Friday, January 25). I'm impressed with the appearance and quality of the unit ... I read the debate you had at CureZone with the fellow who makes the ParaZapper. The fact that I purchased YOUR unit, tells you who I thought won the debate. I appreciated your knowledge, your logic, and how articulate you are."
Ronn G.
Jan. 31, 2008.
DAVIE ETHEREDGE with KEVIN TRUDEAU
THE LARCENIST HELPER
I have been in contact with David Etheredge over a long period of time and have observed his way of doing things. I will provide one clear example here. David Etheredge's sense of morality is such that after Kevin Trudeau mentioned the ParaZapper name in his book, and David Etheredge's phone was ringing off the wall with new orders, Kevin Trudeau suddenly became David Etheredge's heroic health savior on Curezone. According to David Etheredge, Kevin Trudeau has done so much good for humanity by publishing his book (Amazon reviewers of Kevin Trudea's book are in complete disagreement with David Etheredge on this point, by the way) that Kevin Trudeau's selfless service to humanity obliterates his criminal behavior. His transgressions can be and should be completely ignored, according to David Etheredge. Otherwise David Etheredge might be tainted with them by his enthusiastic support for Kevin Trudeau. That would not make David Etheredge look very good because he cannot resist using Kevin Trudeau's name to promote his ParaZapper sales. So David Etheredge reaches into his bag of convoluted logic to make things look good for Kevin Trudeau -- and for himself. Moral guilt through the support of a convicted and active larcenist becomes transmuted into moral rectitude by the legerdemain of David Etheredge. It seems fitting that we nickname David Etheredge the David Copperfield of the zapper industry?
KEVIN TRUDEAU'S CUSTOMERS HAVE A SITE
COMPLAINING ABOUT HIS LARCENY
The fact is that Kevin Trudeau is a convicted larcenist who spent time in the penitentiary for conning people out of hundreds of thousands of dollars. And the fact is that he has not changed his ways. He continues to cheat customers out of their money on his website in defiance of the law. Since the individual sums are not large enough to justify any single customer hiring a lawyer to pursue the matter Kevin Trudeau is able to get away with fraud and larceny. All of this is irrelevant according to David Etheredge whose support for Kevin Trudeau never wavers, even in spite of the fact that there is a website devoted to the thousands of internet customers who document their cases of being cheated by Kevin Trudeau who puts false charges on their credit cards and refuses to remove them. According to David Etheredge this can all be easily explained. According to David Etheredge it must be Kevin Trudeau's employees who are doing this. It could not be the upstanding, selfless Kevin Trudeau, the helper of hhumanity, who is participating in such illegal activity. That's the end of story for David Etheredge who is interested in closing the book on this affair rather than showing the least interest in examining the facts to find out the truth of the matter. That Kevin Trudeau's employees are the malfactors is a totally unproven and clearly presumptuous exculpatory claim on the part of David Etheredge. He provides no proof whatsoever for this statement made with characteristic authority -- it is unquestionable, is his attitude. David Etheredge's statement is total speculation without any support in fact -- a supposition that is clearly created to make Kevin Trudeau look good. Because if it makes Kevin Trudeau looks good that makes David Etheredge look good. It is hard to use someone's name to promote sales if he is a known larcenist. If Kevin Trudeau looks bad then David Etheredge looks bad, too -- guilt by association. So, yah gotta find a way to make it look good. (Making unfounded claims with no proof is a tactic David Etherdge also uses in support of his ParaZappers.)
WHY DOESN'T KEVIN TRUDEAU CALL THE POLICE
IF HIS EMPLOYEES ARE THE REAL THIEVES
If it is true that Kevin Trudeau's employees are cheating customers then why has Kevin Trudeau not investigated the matter and fired those responsible for this criminal activity? Whose bank account is this stolen money going into, Kevin Trudeau's account or his employees' accounts? If the money is going into Kevin Trudeau's own account why has he not done the right thing by calling the police to report criminal activity on the part of his employees? Why has he not refunded the customers who have been cheated out of their hard-earned money, who have lodged complaints and who have created their own website to make their complaint public and highly visible? If the stolen money is going into his employees' accounts why has Kevin Trudeau not filed criminal charges against those employees for stealing money that he cannot return to his customers who have been cheated? Why has he not insisted on a criminal investigation in the face of obvious criminal activity? Because Kevin Trudeau is the real criminal. Why does David Etheredge brush all this aside as unimportant and refuse to answer any of these questions? Because David Etheredge will find any excuse to support even a criminal if that criminal has helped put money in David Etheredge's bank account. His sense of right and wrong is dictated by his financial interests. Plain and simple.
THE CONSEQUENCES
Has David Etheredge taken lessons from Kevin Trudeau? Here is how David Etheredge does business. Here is now he treats his customers. He has a 10-day returns policy for his ParaZapper. He says that if returns are postmarked after day 14 customers are subject to a 60% penalty. But when I asked David Etheredge about this on Curezone he denied that he imposes these penalties on customers. He only uses them to scare customers. Scare customers? What kind of mentality is this? What kind of business practice is this? Trying to intimidate customers is the right way to do business? Well it certainly is not, according to my way of thinking. I have a 3-month trial offer for The Ultimate Zapper. Customers have up to 4 months to return their zapper. I don't look at postmarks, I don't have a punitive returns policy and I would never think of trying to intimidate customers. Doing business the right way is about attracting customers by offering a superior product, not trying to intimidate them. frankly, I find David Etheredge's way of doing business very strange. Read Competition Part 1 for more about David Etheredge and ParaZapper.
By 2006 it must have been clear to the authorities that David Etheredge was careless about his business practices, that he possessed a poor sense of judgment and that he had a serious problem with ethics. More importantly for the authorities, David Etheredge made himself very vulnerable because he was breaking the law. In 2006 the government raided his premises, seized his assets, closed his business down and took legal action. David Etheredge complied with a Federal judicial warning related to the illegal marketing of his ParaZapper. He was allowed to reopen for business several months later. He says he is being watched by government lawyers as well as his own lawyers. Knowing how he does business this does not surprise me in the least.
3. TWO DECEPTIONS -- FOR STARTERS
The first deception: The Dr. Clark Research Association (the Super DeLuxe 2003, Super Zapper DeLuxe 2006, Dr. Clark Full Gamma II, the Vari-Zapper and the Vari-Gamma), Dr. Hulda Clark Digital Zapper, HFA-4 Hulda Clark Zapper, the Clark Zapper, the Z4e-Extreme Hulda Clark Zapper, the Auto-Zap and Auto-Zap 5 (Hulda Clark Zappers) and ParaZapper (Hulda Clark zappers) use Dr. Clark's name -- without her consent -- to promote sales. Dr. Clark does not endorse them and is not affiliated with any manufacturer or any site or any product that uses her name -- according to her own website.
The second deception: digital "zappers" are not zappers at all. They are frequency generators. Their makers call them zappers because the market for zappers is much larger than the market for frequency generators and they want to be in the big marketplace with popular zappers, not in the small marketplace with no zappers around. There is a huge difference between zappers and frequency generators which I discuss at #4 on the FAQ Page. I discuss the complexity and high cost of frequency generators on the Competition 1 Page. Digital makers often take advantage of people's confusion to sell them hundreds of dollars worth of products they don't need -- or even understand -- like syncrometers, program drivers and smart keys. These manufacturers claims that their "zappers" are superior but Dr. Clark says "sophisticated gizmos" do not make them better or more effective, they only make them look more impressive. The fact is that all digitals have weak formulas and they don't even produce harmonics according to Dr. Howard May. The Charts that include 10 digital "zappers" for comparative purposes show that the best of the lot has only 4 of 11 features that make zappers effective.
4. DR. CLARK RESEARCH ASSOCIATION
David Amrein owns the Dr. Clark Research Association. He is not a doctor yet he
wears a white medical gown on his site as he recounts the story of his recent flight
to Africa -- like a latterday Albert Schweitzer. He delivers the news that his zapper
(over $400 -- not including the required add-ons) is effective against malaria --
inferring that this is unique and unprecedented. Can the Nobel Prize be far off?
He ignores the fact that The Ultimate Zapper ($179.95 -- no add-ons required) has
been used for years by doctors in hospitals in several
African countries to successfully eradicate malaria in a matter of days -- backed
by blood tests. For example, Dr. Ben G. in Zambia treats all his malaria patients
with The Ultimate Zapper. All blood tests have come back
from the lab "malaria negative" after 6 days of zapping. David Amrein recently
emailed me that I have "bad business ethics".
For years David Amrein has stated on
his site that his zapper's "stabilized wave remains stable under load. No
other zapper on the market has such a stable wave!" But The Ultimate Zapper has
had a stabilized wave for years. I wonder why he ignores the information on my site
-- and my emails reminding him about The Ultimate Zapper's stabilized wave. In fact,
I am the only maker in the world who provides visual proof
for a stabilized wave. David Amrein recently emailed me that I have "bad business
ethics".
DAVID AMREIN LOOKS LIKE A DOCTOR
|
DAVID AMREIN OBTAINED DR. CLARK'S
PERMISSION TO USE HER NAME?
The Dr. Clark Research Association should be called the David Amrein Research Association because it is solely owned by David Amrein and is not affiliated with Dr. Clark, according to the statements Dr. Clark makes on her site. Her statements have not deterred David Amrein from using her name to promote his products. In fact, there are so many products on his site it looks like an encyclopedia. More below. In his emails to me David Amrein claims he obtained Dr. Clark's permission in 1998 to use her name for his site. I have repeatedly asked him for proof of his claim but he has repeatedly refused to provide any. Dr. Clark has not issued a statement supporting David Amrein's claim. Nor has David Amrein provided any proof that Dr. Clark has allowed him to profit from using her name by calling his shop Dr. Clark's Shop. People who see Dr. Clark's Shop might get the impression that Dr. Clark is affilliated with it. Dr. Clark says she most certainly is not. Dr. Clark's Shop should be called David Amrein's Shop. If and when David Amrein provides proof of an affiliation with Dr. Clark or an endorsement by Dr. Clark I will be glad to post it here. I am still waiting.
September 9, 2009. I have a sad piece of news to report today. Dr. Hulda Clark passed away on September 3, 2009.
THE SUPER DELUXE IS CALLED A ZAPPER
BUT IS REALLY A FREQUENCY GENERATOR
I believe that David Amrein is deceptive about his marketing practices and that he still makes unsubstantiated claims for his products. His site is a maze of hundreds of products. The Vari-Zapper has recently replaced the Super DeLuxe but it is basically the same device -- only more expensive. According to the order page on his site the Super Deluxe/Vari-Zapper is not a "stand-alone" product. You need to spend a substantial amount of money for everything required to make the Super DeLuxe/Vari-Zapper work as designed because it is designed to work as a frequency generator. The Vari-Zapper can only be used as a zapper if a "module" that costs $126.00 is added on -- bringing the total cost of this zapper to $420.00 If the add-ons are not added to the Super DeLuxe it functions as a common high-frequency zapper. Read more at #4 and #5 on the FAQ Page about the difference between a zapper and a frequency generator.
But wait. This is only the beginning of a long and expensive trek. To make the Super DeLuxe/Vari-Zapper work as designed you also need the "Smart Key Programmer, Hard - & Software" that costs $600.00, the smart keys and the program drivers, the syncrometer -- David Amrein's model costs $309.00 -- the course to become proficient in the use of the sycrometer -- which can take 6 months -- and the test vials that cost nearly $800.00. Here is what Dr. Hulda Clark -- the inventor of the zapper and the syncrometer -- has to say about the syncrometer: "Excellent results are possible without synchrometer testing ..." Nevertheless, the syncrometer is the basis of David Amrein's marketing-driven syncrometer/smart key approach. In The Cure for All Diseases Dr. Clark stated that the simplest, least expensive and most effective way to kill pathogens is to forget about the expensive and compicated frequency generator option and use a zapper -- you don't need a syncrometer, syncrometer courses, test vials or a Super DeLuxe frequency generator "zapper" with its smart keys and program drivers. All you need is a single-frequency zapper, according to Dr. Clark. Ironically, David Amrein uses Dr. Clark's name to sell exactly the opposite approach -- and a very expensive one at that.
IT SURE DOES LOOK LIKE
A HAPPY MARRIAGE
Who is the Dr. Clark Research Center [more below] and why do they direct people on their site as follows: "To buy a syncrometer go here: Syncrometer under Products Dr. Clark". The Dr. Clark Research Center uses Dr. Clark's name to lead people directly to David Amrein's order page -- in spite of the fact Dr. Clark says you can get excellent results without the syncrometer. David Amrein has stopped using photos of Dr. Clark smiling down on his website since I started writing about this on my site. But the Dr. Clark Information Center uses those photos on their site where they point prospective buyers directly to the order page on David Amrein's site. Well, there is not much difference between David Amrein having both the information and sales pages on his own site and having the Dr. Clark Research Center information site put a direct link to his order page on their site. It sure looks like a happy marriage, not an accident or a coincidence and certainly not the "independent" arrangement David Amrein insists it is. This "independent" arrangement helps David Amrein sell his "Zincrometer" that costs $309.00, his "Smart Key Programmer, Hard- & Software" that costs $600.00, and all the other add-ons available on his order page. David Amrein's marketing practices are based on this principle: use Dr. Clark's name to promote sales but do not publish any statements by her that may have a negative impact on sales -- such as her statement that "excellent results are possible without synchrometer testing."
IS IT WORTH ALL THE TIME
ALL THE EFFORT AND ALL THE EXPENSE?
From the customer's side, trying to assess the practical aspects of all this is not an easy task. The first question that comes to mind is, "Do the results justify spending so much money and devoting so much time and energy to this project?" Maybe yes, but maybe no. Results are not guaranteed no matter how much time, money and effort you put into all this. Electrical engineer Arthur Doerksen has stated the expensive, complicated approach "is not necessary". And these 3 testimonials are typical of many unsolicited testimonials I have received about the Super Deluxe Zapper:
"... In the mean time [while waiting for my Ultimate Zapper to arrive] I will continue zapping with my super deluxe zapper, I am busy with the driver programs but I don't see [any] progress after 2 months of zapping.
best regards,
Ann V.
Jan. 25, 2008"
"Hello,
I am interested in purchasing The Ultimate Zapper, but would first like to know
what the "Big Savings on 2 or More Zappers" consists of ??? Shortly after the release
of "Cure for All Diseases, my husband built 3 zappers using Hulda Clark's directions.
Using this home-built zapper and the Clark "Herbal Parasite Killing Program, an
egg-size mass in my breast disappeared within 6 weeks. We were interested in a frequency
generator, so a number of years ago we purchased the early model of the Super Zapper
DeLuxe with the Smart Keys. In the years since, we have not noticed any results
with the Super Zapper DeLuxe. I have learned a lot by reading your site and the
additional pages I was able to access by Googling "The Ultimate Zapper". I appreciate
the effort you have put into the "Comparison Charts" and organizing the "Testimonials".
I will look forward to hearing of your offer for 2 Ultimate Zappers.
Thank you,
Sheila C.
Aug. 4, 2010."
"Dear. Mr. Presner:
My wife and I just purchased your zapper a couple weeks ago after having one from
what we thought was Dr. Clark for a couple years (was from the foundation)[Dr. Clark
Research Association]. We purchased it to help kill parasites, but ended up getting
the Swiss chips [the Smart Keys] to kill cancer and help heal my prostate. I have
battled prostate cancer for a few years now. Can you tell me if this zapper kills
cancer cells, especially those within or without the prostate? By the way, our old
one appeared to be malfunctioning and when I called and left messages for help,
I never got a call back. I spoke with one person who said someone would call me
back, and even after leaving two more messages, no answer. I wouldn't exactly call
that good customer service! Anyway, it forced us to look further and eventually
find you. God works in some mysterious ways at times. Their zapper would constantly
be going out of sync and beeping until I hit a button a couple times and then it
would start up again till one or two sequences later when it would start all over
again. We finally began to wonder if it was working at all. (??)
Sincerely,
Ken T.
Feb. 2, 2010"
The Super DeLuxe and its required add-ons are just the beginning of the long odyssey into David Amrein's world of sophisticated marketing practices, encyclopedic list of products and implied medical claims.
But wait. According to the Dr. Clark Research Center, David Amrein's Super DeLuxe/Vari-Zapper and all the required add-ons may not be sufficient for treating cancer, which is still the focus of David Amrein's site and the Dr. Clark Information Center. They both recommend the The 21-day Dr. Clark Cancer Curing Program to "cure" cancer -- in spite of the 2004 US Federal court agreement involved false medical claims made for The Program by David Amrein. In my opinion, nothing has changed regarding David Amrein's false medical claims. I explain why on this page. The 21-day Program was developed by Dr. Clark. Conveniently, the products you need for The 21-day Cancer Curing Program are for sale on David Amrein's site in Dr. Clark's Shop. The cost of The Program is $1890.00 but the final tally is much higher because The 21-day Program is supplemented by other "clean-ups" that are not included in the price. The $1890.00 price for The 21-day Program includes the Super DeLuxe 2006 and the supplements. It does not include the cost of the syncrometer, the cost of the course to become proficient in its use which can take 6 months, the cost of the the smart keys and the program drivers, and the cost of the test vials. And The 21-day Program does not include the substantial cost of the other "clean-ups". More to follow.
DO YOU MEAN TO SAY THAT
ALL THIS IS REASONABLE?
David Amrein says the cost of the program is "reasonable". You be the judge. Here is The 21-day Dr. Clark Cancer Curing Program from the Dr. Clark Information Center site. Apparently, it only applies to cancer. What about Multiple Sclerosis and Crohn's disease and all the other diseases? Is it also applicable to other diseases? I believe that Dr. Clark's work clearly points in this direction. I followed some of her suggestions in The Cure for All Diseases and was very glad when my health showed dramatic improvement. I did not follow the expensive and complicated 21-day Program yet I was able to recover from both Multiple Sclerosis and Crohn's disease. More below.
Have a look at these 6 encyclopedic lists of things that The 21-day Program requires you to do: Saliva Tests, Syncrometer testing, Test Flow Sheet, Search What and Where, Clearing Body, and Changes to Make.
Here is a direct quote from Arthur Doerksen's old Auto-Zap site -- no longer online -- about learning how to use the syncrometer for testing purposes:
"Although simple in concept, the syncrometer is difficult to master. Dr. Clark says it requires six months of diligent practice before one is ready to test others. It also requires the creation or purchase of a great many test substances for use as test standards, to enable one to thoroughly test and research the human body with its many systems and organs. We are always looking for more people to become Syncrometer testers but it is definitely not for everyone."
Think you're done yet? Think again. The 21-day Program does not include the cost of the dental "clean-up" -- the removal of "silver amalgam" fillings from the mouth that contain 50% mercury, and their replacement with plastic composites or other mercury-free, biocompatible dental materials.
Think you're done yet? Think again. The 21-day Program does not include the cost of chelation therapy to remove mercury from the organs and tissues after the dental "clean-up" is done. In my opinion the dental "clean-up" and chelation therapy are the 2 most important things in the recovery process, and the first things to do.
Think you're done yet? Think again. The 21-day Program does not include the cost of the other "clean-ups", the liver cleanses and the kidney cleanses. I think it is obvious by now that The 21-day Program is very complicated, very expensive and very rigorous. In my opinion, anyone who decides to do it must have extraordinary energy and motivation, the patience of Job and a lot of money to see it through.
DON'T FORGET TO READ ALL THE CAVEATS
AND ALL THE DISCLAIMERS
The Test Flow Sheet on the Dr. Clark Information Center site states: "For
the 3-Week Cancer Curing Program ... This flow sheet gives you a path that leads
to success with certainty." After using the words "cure" and "certainty" which create
expectations that cannot be called vague, you'll find the following caveats on the
Dr. Clark Information Center web site:
"Please bear in mind that:
* the dental clean-up and other clean-ups are still the core of the therapy;
* no therapy in medicine works in 100% of the cases, and the disappointing result
may be just for lack of correct application.
* the best results are only possible if Syncrometer testing is available.
* With this 3 week program dentalwork, homeography, platezapping and the correct
diet for each single case are part of this protocol and not to be done without."
Hold on now. Let me digress. Do you mean to say we're not done yet? Homeography -- the "Tools for Homeographic Beginner's Set" costs $232.00 -- platezapping -- the "Beginnerset for Platezapping" costs $423.00 -- and correct diet? You didn't mention these items before. And after spending all the required time, effort and money on all of the above, if there is a "disappointing result" you tell me that it may be because of "lack of correct application". What the heck? What do you mean? I "applied" something incorrectly? How can I find out what I "applied" incorrectly after I have "applied" the hundreds of things that The 21-day Program requires? And if I can't figure this out who can help me figure this out? Do you mean I have to guess and start all over again and just hope for the best?
When all is said and done, after all the expense, after all the time and effort, after all the "application", after using the words "cure" and "certainty" which create unequivocal expectations, Dr. Clark Information Center presents its list of caveats and its Disclaimer that deny all the claims they have just made for their 21-Day Program. Oh, and don't forget the Dr. Clark Reserach Association's own disclaimer. It looks to me like they have all the bases covered. Let me check, yup, they're all covered.
IS SUCH A COMPLICATED, RIGOROUS
AND EXPENSIVE PROGRAM REALLY NECESSARY?
The 21-day Program is not only complicated, rigorous and very expensive, it is far longer than 21 days because it requires taking a course to learn how to use the syncrometer which is very difficult to master, as Arthur Doerksen points out. You have to devote at least 6 months of practice to become proficient in its use, according to Arthur Doerksen of the Auto-Zap zapper who also sells syncrometers. I will be providing more references regarding the syncrometer soon, right here.
In my opinion and from my own personal experience it is not necessary to follow an expensive and complicated program that requires an enormous amount of time and energy in the attempt to recover one's health. It was not necessary for me to follow such a program to recover from 2 incurable diseases and it was not necessary in the case of many others I know. Please remember that I recovered from total paralysis with Multiple Sclerosis (1989) and from near-death with Crohn's disease (1994).
My Recovery Protocol takes a different approach and a more affordable one. And I do not profit from any of the products in my protocol because I do not sell any of them -- except for The Ultimate Zapper, the footpads, the universal AC adapter for overseas customers and my e-books. Everything else in my protocol is provided by third parties with whom I have no personal connection, no business connection and no affiliation. Since it is against the law, I do not make any medical claims or guarantees of success regarding any of the suggestions I make in my protocol. I never use the word "cure" and I never use the word "certainty".
THE POSSIBLE RISK OF GUILT
BY EXTREMELY CLOSE ASSOCIATION
In my opinion, it is very clear that The 21-day Dr. Clark Cancer Curing Program makes medical claims and guarantees and that these claims and guarantees are promoted by the Dr. Clark Information Center that publishes this information and by the Dr. Clark Research Association that sells the products that people need to purchase for The 21-day Program: "For the 3-week cancer-curing program ... This flow sheet gives you a path that leads to success with certainty ..." This is information that comes directly from the Dr. Clark Information Center. Does the Dr. Clark Research Association that sells these products disagree? If so, where is their statement to that effect?
Are The 21-day Program and the Dr. Clark Information Center directly linked to David Amrein? They certainly are. They are directly linked to David Amrein's Dr. Clark Research Association order page. Let me preface my observations. First of all, David Amrein's Dr. Clark Research Association and the Dr. Clark Information Center are both located in Switzerland. Is this a coincidence? Is it a coincidence that David Amrein chose to decouple his information pages from his order pages after the 2004 US Federal court judgment by divesting them to an "independent" company that links its information pages directly back to David Amrein's order page? Is it a coincidence that the link to David Amrein's Dr. Clark's Shop is on the left-hand margin of each page on the Dr. Clark Information Center site?
David Amrein says that the Dr. Clark Infomation Center is "independent" but it is crystal clear that the Dr. Clark Information Center has a direct link to David Amrein's site via the Dr. Clark Information Center's margin. Only David Amrein's site is so directly and so visibly linked on the Dr. Clark Information Center site. There are other commercial interests with less visible and less direct links on the Dr. Clark Information Center site but there is only one site that they link to directly on the margin of their site -- that site is David Amrein's site, specifically his Dr. Clark's Shop, his order page. It seems clear that the "divestiture" -- the decoupling -- was an artifice designed to keep the commercial loop firmly in place -- "independent" information about Dr. Clark's products at the Dr. Clark Research Center linked directly to David Amrein's order page -- his "Dr. Clark's Shop" on his "Dr. Clark Research Association" site. Of course they are not really Dr. Clark's products, they are David Amrein's products. The Dr. Clark Research Center acts as a thinly disguised proxy for David Amrein's Dr. Clark Research Association and his Dr. Clark's Shop.
David Amrein says the Dr. Clark Information Center is doing a fine job. I can understand why he might say that. Perhaps all this is merely a happy coincidence. If so, in my opinion it is obviously a very convenient and a very profitable coincidence for David Amrein. But since David Amrein consented to a 2004 Federal court judgment for making false medical claims and fraudulent advertising this is a bit awkward. There could be trouble brewing. I wonder if he has advised the Dr. Clark Information Center not to link their site with his site because of possible legal risk to him as a result of the direct link between their medical claims and his products. Otherwise one might reasonable infer that he is giving his tacit consent to their medical claims -- since he profits directly from them -- which could expose him to litigation -- once again. It might be wise for David Amrein to ask the Dr. Clark Information Center to cut their links with his site.
QUESTIONS ABOUT
DR. CLARK'S CREDIBILITY
I have two stories to report about Dr. Clark. One is from here. It tells of a lady who went to Dr. Clark's clinic in Tijuana with a tumor, was finally told by Dr. Clark that she was cured, had a scan done afterward that showed her tumor had grown two and a half times in size, and ended up dying. He daughter who was very bitter wrote the story.
My second story is about Dr. Clark's books. Dr. Clark uses of the word "cure" liberally in her books. This invites close scrutiny. "Cure" is the strongest of claims. It carries a heavy burden of proof. In my opinion, the proof of "cure" offered in Dr. Clark's books does not even come close to meeting scientific standards for proof of cure. Her claim to have over 100 "cures" in The Cure for All Cancers is clearly false. I base my comments on the following observations: the cover of The Cure for All Cancers states that it includes "over 100 Case Histories of Persons Cured". This is clearly untrue. I have read the first 58 case histories only. Frankly, I got a bit tired after #58 but it was a sufficient number for the purposes of my analysis. I invite you to read the case histories yourself. Here are the statistics that I compiled from the information that Dr. Clark provides in those case histories:
cured: 16
worse: 1
dying: 3
died: 4
opted out: 1
started treatment: 4
no change: 4
progress unclear: 2
progress made: 23
Let's see, 16 "cured" out of 58 cases that were all alleged to have been "cured" according to the claim made on the cover of the book. After I reviewed those 58 case histories carefully I had no choice but to reach the conclusion that the cover of the book is misleading. Anyone knowing this must, at the very least, be wary about the content and the import of the case histories, in my opinion. In addition, many of the histories that Dr. Clark offers are difficult to decipher. They are presented inconsistently, in unscientific terms, with information that is often vague, and with Dr. Clark's personal comments and speculation interspersed in the text. All of these factors add up to an unclear picture of the details of what really happened in many of the cases she describes. In short, I was not as impressed with Dr. Clark's "cures" as some other zapper makers have been and who have made positive comments about them. In my opinion, it is obvious that bringing testimonials to a higher standard in order to lend credibility to them will require a much more rigorous methodology than Dr. Clark uses. It would probably require millions of dollars and many years of rigorous research with clearly-defined standards before this is could ever be accomplished.
The testimonials on this site are presented as anecdotal evidence and nothing more. If anyone concludes that any testimonial on this site contains information they would like to experiment with then this is done by each individual on an experimental basis through their own choice. Not because any claim is made or implied for any of the testimonials.
PLAYING GOD AND
PLAYING WITH PEOPLE'S LIVES
I believe in hope. I lived on pure hope for many years, struggling to recover from Multiple Sclerosis and Crohn's disease. But I do not believe in giving people false hope. And I believe that making money by doing so is immoral. As far as I am aware David Amrein never had to struggle to recover from 2 incurable diseases, let alone 1 incurable disease, as I did. So, in my opinion, it is easy for him to allow others to act as a proxy for him. It is easy for him to allow others to make the claims of "cure" that he is no longer supposed to be making -- since the court order that he agreed to regarding false medical claims and fraudulent advertising in 2004. It is easy for him to allow the Dr. Clark Information Center to point people directly to his order page. I believe he is still making unsubstantiated medical claims -- contrary to the terms of 2004 Final Court Judgment -- by allowing the Dr. Clark Information Center to act as a proxy for him and by not renouncing their role as a proxy.
It is clear that the Dr. Clark Information Center are making medical claims and that they are directing people to David Amrein's Dr. Clark's Shop on his Dr. Clark Research Association site. Ergo, in my opinion, the same medical claims referred to in the 2004 Federal court order are still being made by David Amrein for financial gain because he allows the link on the Dr. Clark Information Center to remain in place -- while speaking highly of their "independent" work in an attempt to create the illusion of distance between them. He has neither criticized nor renounced their link to his order page. In my opinion, it is obvious David Amrein is in collusion with the Dr. Clark Information Center and it is obvious that the motive is commercial gain. Otherwise, what I have alluded to in my discussion, above, is just a happy coincidence for David Amrein, which I do not believe for one second.
The Dr. Clark Information Center site that is directly linked to David Amrein's Dr. Clark Research Association site uses the words "cure" and "certainty". Those words are nowhere to be found on my site nor are they implied by me. If David Amrein takes the time to read the Disclaimer & Privacy Page on this site he will learn that I make no medical claims whatsoever for The Ultimate Zapper or for any of the information on my site. It is clearly against the law to do so. I believe it is clearly against the law to talk about "cure" and "certainty" unless those claims are backed by scientific proof.
My message and the bottom line: Dr. Clark has a Ph.D. in physiology. She is not a medical doctor and her methodology as a researcher is seriously flawed, in my opinion, as I explain above. David Amrein has an MBA and a naturopathic degree. The MBA came first. The letter B stands for business. He says on his c.v. that his work experience is mostly in marketing. In my opinion, David Amrein is first and foremost a marketer, a businessman. He makes medical claims for his products based on Dr. Clark's research and uses Dr. Clark's name for commercial gain. I have an ordinary B.A. That stands for Bachelor of Arts. I refer to a few details of Dr. Clark's research but I do not use her name for commercial gain. And I make no medical claims whatsoever on my site and when I communicate with people by telephone or email.
In my opinion none of us has a moral right to play with people's lives, to claim we have "cures" when we don't have any and to promise people the moon. The word "cure" is a very big 4-letter word. It should be used with extreme caution. I believe that zapping can be a wonderful thing for many people on an experimental basis. But to make categorical claims and to develop this zapper thing into an industry where prospective customers are told that hundreds of products and thousands of dollars are necessary for them to rehabilitate their health with "certainty" -- and then to disclaim it all in the end -- is playing God and playing with people's lives. As I said earlier, this is clearly an exercise in deceptive marketing.
David Amrein says I have "bad business ethics". He agreed to a US Federal court order in 2004 related to the false medical claims he was making for his products and for fraudulent advertising. He recently emailed me warning that I make sure the facts on my site are true -- which I consider a tad ironic given his history of false claims and fraudulent advertising. He has sent me an ultimatum to "clean up" my site by July 8, 2009 -- or else. Because of David Amrein's belligerence, maliciousness and continuous threats I will be informing visitors to my site about ongoing events on this page but I will no longer correspond with him. I already mentioned that I think it is very unwise for people in glass houses to throw stones. I believe it is crystal clear that David Amrein lives in a big glass house.
5. AUTO-ZAP
Below, I discuss the claims Arthur Doerksen makes for his new Auto-Zap 5 zapper. I also discuss the old Auto-Zap -- formerly claimed by him to be "the best zapper" -- that has now apparently been rendered obsolete by his new Auto-Zap 5 model. (I note he has adopted 2 of The Ultimate Zapper's features in his new zapper.)
HEALTH IN A HURRY? REALLY?
LET'S TAKE A CLOSE LOOK AT THE AUTO-ZAP 5
Arthur Doerksen's website is heavy on medical claims and marketing slogans but light on details. He talks about a "lifetime of wellness" and he promises quick results -- in 5 minutes flat. Frankly, I don't know who in their right mind would believe such an outlandish claim. He says "we have the only 5 minute Hulda Clark Zapper". What he is actually doing is making medical claims to attract people looking for a quick fix -- selling the idea of speed and using Dr. Clark's name to promote sales. Harmonic Quad claims to "kill all invaders" in 3 minutes. I guess this means that Arthur Doerksen's Auto-Zap 5 is 2 minutes behind in the race for "wellness". The fact is that it takes time to recover from serious illness. In many cases it takes a lot of time to get back to good health. I know. It took me years to recover from Multiple Sclerosis and Crohn's disease. All the talk about "health in a hurry" and "boosting" the immune system in 5 minutes flat is utter nonsense and I explain why on this page.
Let's look at the issue of speed. First of all, I find it ironic that up till now Arthur Doerksen was religious about the "7-minute Dr. Clark Cycle". He programmed this single zapping cycle into the Auto-Zap and offered no other option for users of his Auto-Zap. Well, that's history now. The Auto-Zap is obsolete because the single-cycle zapper based on the 7-minute Dr. Clark Cycle is no good anymore, according to Arthur Doerksen. It looks like owners of his Auto-Zap were just wasting their time. Arthur Doerksen says all you need is 5 minutes flat with the new Auto-Zap 5 -- and offers 4 other zapping cycles if the 5-minute miracle hasn't worked for you. I discuss below why using pre-programmed timing cycles creates problems.
For 14 years Arthur Doerksen talked about the programmed 7-minute timer cycle as though it were an important feature of his Auto-Zap and the only way to zap effectively. Well, it was an important selling point for the Auto-Zap because the Auto-Zap has only 1 true feature -- its low frequency. The fact is that the 7-minute timer is a non-feature. It is what I call a "bell and whistle". It does not add to the effectiveness of zapping -- which is what features are all about. The timer is a distraction and actually causes problems because programmed cycles prevent the flexibility that is essential zapping. Many people need to zap for only 15 to 30 seconds with The Ultimate Zapper because it is so powerful. Others take 1, 3, 5, or 7 minutes, or even longer. Each person is different and everyone has to experiment to see what works best for him or her. I have talked about this for 13 years and thousands of users of The Ultimate Zapper have proved that this is true. I have never programmed zapping cycles into The Ultimate Zapper. This gives users the flexibility they need to find out what works best for them. With The Ultimate zapper the choices are unlimited -- which is the way it must be for each person to be able to find out what works best. Restricting choices eliminates flexibility and this can mean the difference between good results and no results at all.
But there are more serious issues that arise when examining what Arthur Doerksen's has to say about his new Auto-Zap 5 -- issues concerning medical claims. His claims that the Auto-Zap 5 will "boost" the immune system and that 5 minutes of zapping guarantees "a lifetime of wellness" are backed by no evidence whatsoever. They represent unsubstantiated medical claims and fraudulent advertising. Making such categorical claims is not only irresponsible and unethical, it is also against the law.
Arthur Doerksen says his Auto-Zap 5 has had "four years of field testing". Four years is a long time. Presumably, a mountain of evidence was accumulated over that period of time. So, where is the proof? Arthur Doerksen provides none whatsoever. He doesn't say how many people were tested, he doesn't give any details about the testing criteria, he doesn't talk about the testing protocol, he doesn't say what illnesses were involved in the testing and he provides no details about the various outcomes of the testing -- related to the broad health categories and specific illnesses that are covered in the testimonial archive on this site.
THE SMOKING GUN
Frankly, the red flag goes straight up the pole for me when I read zapper sites where serious health claims are made but no evidence is provided. In this case everything is left to the imagination and we're asked to take all of Arthur Doerksen's medical claims at face value.
I'm sorry, but medical claims must be backed by evidence in order to be legitimate and credible -- and legal. Arthur Doerksen provides no evidence at all for his medical claims nor does he qualify a single claim that he makes. But he makes sure to do one special thing -- in the fine print of his disclaimer he makes sure that he denies every claim that he makes in the large print of his text. This is what I call the smoking gun. In my opinion this is a dangerous game to play.
Since it is against the law to make medical claims I do not do so either on my site or in email or telephone contact with people -- and I state this clearly on my site. The Ultimate Zapper has had 14 years of field testing involving thousands of customers. You can read about the results in 300 unsolicited testimonials in The Archive indexed under 12 broad health categories. You can read about how The Ultimate Zapper accomplishes these results on the Home Page and other linked pages on this site -- none of which imply any medical claims whatsoever.
When you take a close look at the Auto-Zap 5's features in The Charts on this site you can see that they are common to basic zappers -- in spite of the hype surrounding them on the Auto-Zap site. So one can reasonably expect the Auto-Zap 5 will produce results that are no different from other common zappers. If this were not true then one would reasonably expect that a lot of evidence would have been presented regarding with the launch of the Auto-Zap 5. This was not the case -- as shown by the resounding silence regarding evidence. This is an obvious smoking gun. Read the discussion of this below -- including a discussion of the "special" coil added to the Auto-Zap 5 and why it is not really special at all. I have just added the Auto-Zap 5 to The Charts where you can directly compare the 29 most popular zappers based on the 11 features that make zappers effective. The Auto-Zap 5 is a poor sister in comparison with The Ultimate Zapper.
"THE QUICK FIX"
FOR THE IMMUNE SYSTEM
The Auto-Zap 5 claims to "boost" the immune system. This is a very serious
claim to offer people with serious illnesses. In fact it constitutes a categorical
medical claim and all such claims demand an explanation and proof. But, astonishingly,
Arthur Doerksen does not provide any explanation at all or any proof at all regarding
what he means by "boosting" the immune system. He seems to attribute his claim it
to the addition of the "special" coil to the old Auto-Zap -- similar to
the Terminator. But he is not explicit about this and provides no substantiation
whatsoever for any of his claims. The only clue that he provides to the nature of
the "boost" is that you have to zap everyday to benefit from it. The astounding
promise of a "lifetime of wellness" in "5 minutes flat" is dangled tantalizingly
before the eyes and ears of those who are desperate -- and willing to believe what
Arthur Doerksen has to say. Unfortunately, what he has to say is nothing short of
nonsense. He is part of an email I recently received from a person who talked to
Arthur Doerksen on the phone about his claim:
"Greetings Mr. Presner,
To cut right to the chase, my friend [and I] ... had a long discussion with Arthur
Doerksen about his Auto Zap 5 but his explanation of how his zapper works by "waking
up" your own white cells seemed vague and unsubstantiated and of course, the cost
of his zapper is significant ... It is not easy to sort through all the claims of
the various makers ...
Thanks.
Sally J.
Feb. 9, 2010"
Here is part of an email I received from a customer who purchased Arthur Doerksen's
most expensive -- with the promise that it would solve his health problem:
"Hello Ken,
... To be honest, I trust you, you are a smart person from what you have answered
to my questions, but I trusted the sayings of Arthur Doerksen the same way when
he assured me that ascaris and roundworms were easily killed by his "SuperZappicator
FC8". A big waste of money ! ...
Ranko B.
Feb. 23, 2010"
Here are the facts regarding the immune system The immune system is very complex. In the case of serious illness heavy metal toxicity can disrupt the whole endocrine (glandular) system including the lymphatic (immune) system. An important example of the important effect that metal toxicity can have on the immune system is that the immune system is suppressed by dental mercury from "silver amalgam" fillings that contain -- it is hard to believe -- 50% mercury. In fact, mercury from dental fillings has a devastating effect on the immune system. The immune system is modulated by hormones on T-cell receptors. Hormone receptors can be "captured" by toxic metals -- especially mercury. Arthur Doerksen mentions nothing about the complexity of the immune system and the lengthy and process of revitalizing it. He simply promises an "immune boost" -- a Quick Fix for immunity. He says the Auto-Zap 5's "boost" is the answer to everyone's quest for a "lifetime of wellness" in "5 minutes flat". I explain on this page why this is an irresponsible claim -- a dangerous and false one.
"BOOSTING" THE IMMUNE SYSTEM
vs. REVITALIZING THE IMMUNE SYSTEM
For a moment, for the sake of argument, let's assume that Arthur Doerksen's claim is true that the Auto-Zap 5 "boosts" the immune system. What this could only mean is that it stimulates the immune system temporarily -- and nothing more. Here's why. There are ways to trick the immune system --temporarily. But really revitalizing the immune system, not simply giving it a temporary boost, is a whole other matter. My Recovery Protocol talks about this in detail. Revitalizing immunity is a very complex matter. It depends on many factors -- detoxification, hormone modulation and mineralization, as well. How do I know about all this? My immune system was suppressed when I was paralyzed with Multiple Sclerosis in 1989 and it was further suppressed when I nearly died from Crohn's disease in 1994. My Recovery Protocol tells how I recovered my health. It documents how I revitalized my immune system -- backed by laboratory testing. I did not simply "boost" my immune system temporarily. Arthur Doerksen utters not a single word about the necessity for lab testing to support claims of immune system recovery. That's why I call his claims irresponsible.
A key to the motivation behind Arthur Doerksen's development of the Auto-Zap 5 is his statement that he developed the Auto-Zap 5 as a response to the demand of customers for quick results. He claims his Auto-Zap 5 is the answer to all their "wellness needs". The only problem is that no zapper is the answer to everyone's "wellness needs". No zapper maker can truthfully make such a claim. I make no such promise for The Ultimate Zapper, although it does a far better job at detoxification and Electroporation than any other zapper, for the reasons described on the Home Page on this site where I clearly state that The Ultimate Zapper is part of my protocol for recovery from serious illness, the protocol I used to overcome 2 incurable diseases -- Multiple Sclerosis and Crohn's disease. Although zapping is extremely important, by no means does it constitute the entire protocol. It becomes important in the final stages of immune system recovery.
Here is an example of how the immune system can be "boosted" temporarily. I was paralyzed with MS in 1989. People with MS can the immune system temporarily by using Bee Sting Therapy. This therapy entails undergoing a series of painful bee stings that stimulate the immune system -- for a short time only. This "boost" can provide some relief for symptoms such as mobility and coordination. But the immune system reverts to its former state within a few days and the symptoms return once the "boost" wears off. So people have to visit the bee sting therapist every week for a new "boost".
In other words, people with MS who want temporary relief for symptoms have to become dependent on Bee Sting Therapy. But Bee Sting Therapy is not a quck fix for MS. There is no quick fix for MS or for any other serious illnesses that involve metal or chemical toxicity. There is NO QUICK FIX for restoring the health of the immune system. If one were to assume that Arthur Doerksen's claim of boosting the immune system with the Auto-Zap 5 were true it could only be the equivalent of Bee Sting Therapy, and nothing more. A temporary immune "booster", a temporary stimulus. What makes his claim totally suspect is the fact that Arthur Doerksen provides no proof or evidence to back it. Unlike all the supporting evidence found in My Recovery Protocol his claim is out there blowing in the wind.
GETTING TO THE ROOT OF THE PROBLEM
-- TOXICITY, HORMONE DEPLETION AND MINERALS
Boosting the immune system temporarily for people with MS does not solve the problem of MS. It does not get to the root of the problem which is underlying toxicity, hormone depletion and mineral deficiency. Once the underlying toxicity, hormonal and mineralization issues are addressed the immune system can recover on its own, as God intended, and good health can be restored because the impediments to good health have been removed and the deficiencies have been eliminated. This was precisely what I did to recover my health, and it is precisely what many others have done, as well. I have been fit as a fiddle for the past 15 years. My "lifetime of wellness" did not come by zapping for "5 minutes flat" for a "boost". It came through years of trial and error to discover what really revitalizes the immune system. I write about all of this in detail in My Recovery Protocol.
Ironically, the claims that Arthur Doerksen makes for the Auto-Zap 5 could actually encourage people to avoid getting to the root of serious health problems because it could encourage them to become dependent a supposed temporary "boost" from the Auto-Zap 5. This would not be wise for someone suffering from serious illness for these two reasons. Firstly, temporary symptomatic relief does not solve underlying health problems. Scondly, it might induce the hope that temporary symptomatic relief would eventually become permanent. Temporary relief can, in fact, create false hope that a condition is improving when one's underlying state of health may actually be deteriorating -- which is what normally happens with serious illnesses when toxicity, hormonal and mineral issues are not addressed. In such cases a short-term immune system boost is an illusion that can lead to unwise healthcare choices -- choices that are not in one's long-term interest.
In the sphere of "conventional" medicine, the illusion of improvement in health is often provided by steroid therapy. But it is only an illusion. The underlying state of one's health is actually deteriorating while on steroids --and the steroids actually contribute to a further deterioration. Deterioration becomes apparent when steroids are no longer taken. This is exactly what happened to me while I was taking steroids when I was dying from Crohn's disease in 1994. A temporary solution is often the worst possible choice.
ZAPPING HAS ITS PLACE
-- BUT IT'S NOT THE WHOLE ENCHILADA
Unfortunately, no matter what claims Arthur Doerksen makes for the Auto-Zap 5, there is no "zapping short-cut" that replaces removing toxins from the body and restoring the body to hormonal and mineral health -- which is the only way to create the conditions for revitaling the immune system. I wish there were a "Zap-Yourself-Back-To-Health" miracle -- The Ultimate Zapper would be the top candidate -- but the fact is that there is no such miracle. There is no quick fix that will provide what Arthur Doerksen claims -- "wellness forever". Anyone with an ounce of common sense will know this right away. To boost the immune system more than merely temporarily you have to do the detoxification work that is the basis for restoring health. And you have to do very specific hormone replacement therapy and mineralization therapy -- backed by lab testing as verification.
The overriding importance of detoxification is recognized by Dr. Hulda Clark who writes about it extensively in her books. She has always emphasized the need for detoxification as the first step in restoring the body to good health. Zapping enters the therapeutic picture at the end of the process by killing opportunistic pathogens that are attracted to metal and chemical toxins. Once toxins are removed opportunistic pathogens have nowhere to hide anymore and can be killed. That is why zapping is most effective in serious health cases related to toxicity at the end of the process. I have recently received remarkable reports from an alternative practitioner in South America. She says that she and some of her patients needed only 15 seconds with The Ultimate Zapper to resolve a variety of health issues. It is no exaggeration when I say The Ultimate Zapper is the most powerful zapper in the world.
MY PERSONAL EXPERIENCE
WITH REVITALIZING THE IMMUNE SYSTEM
I write extensively about the process of detoxification and the process of revitalizing the immune system in My Recovery Protocol. After I was paralyzed with Multiple Sclerosis in 1989 I had lab testing done annually at St. Paul's Hospital in Vancouver, Canada, to determine the health of my immune system. They did the CD4/CD8 blood count that shows the absolute value of the killer cells and suppressor cells in the lymphatic system and their ratio. This is the hardstick for measuring the health of the immune system -- the same hardstick that is used to determine the health of the immune system of those who are HIV+ and those who have AIDS. I know about the health of my immune system because of lab testing that was done throughout the whole process of my recovery from Multiple Sclerosis and Crohn's disease -- a process that took nearly 7 years. It took a further 13 years to discover ways to bring my immune system to optimum levels and revitalize it definitively. This latter progress is also backed by the same CD4/CD8 lab testing.
In other words, I have personal field experience of 20 years regarding how to revitalize the immune system. Nowhere in Arthur Doerksen's promotional information for his new Auto-Zap 5 zapper have I read about lab testing of the immune system "in the field" to corroborate his claims that his "field-tested" Auto-Zap 5 boosts the immune system -- even temporarily. The smoking gun is that he offers 3 parasite-related testimonials to support his claims for "boosting" immunity -- but none of these testimonials is remotely related to the immune system. In fact, he offers no specific information or documentation related specifically to the immune system. The parasite-realted reports that he offers are similar to those from users of The Ultimate Zapper that I have received over the years. In fact, I have read hundreds of similar reports from users of The Ultimate Zapper. But I do not pretend that they are proof for revitalizing the immune system.
If Arthur Doerksen is inferring that killing parasites is the same as "boosting the immune system --- he is sorely mistaken. It most certainly is not. Boosting the immune system by zapping can only be accomplished in very specific cases -- if the illnesses being treated are exclusively related to parasitic, bacterial or viral pathogens -- such as in the case of malaria -- where there is no serious underlying metal or chemical toxicity, and if the illness has been serious enough to suppress the immune system. Arthur Doerksen provides no evidence related to the immune system in the 3 testimonials he sites as proof for the success of the Auto-Zap 5. If you wish to read extraordinary stories about parasite killing and health recovery please visit the testimonial archive on this site that has 300 testimonials under 12 broad health categories. If you wish to read about the difference between revitalizing the immune system and boosting it temporarily, please have a look at My Recovery Protocol.
One testimonial Arthur Doerksen offers in support of the success of the Auto-Zap 5 regards Dr. Hulda Clark herself and how she got rid of parasites in her left eye muscle that she had had for 30 years with the Auto-Zap 5. This kind of parasite-related problem is easily resolved -- by just about any zapper. There are dozens of similar reports in the testimonial archive on this site. Ironically, this report does not speak highly of Dr. Clark's own original zapper or the Auto-Zap -- a version of the Dr. Clark zapper -- if they were not able to get rid of her cyst "despite regular zapping", according to Arthur Doerksen. The example of Dr. Clark's problem reminds me of the wart I had for over 30 years that I quickly zapped away over 10 years ago with The Ultimate Zapper. It has never returned.
In the case of Dr. Clark's cyst and the 2 other testimonials Arthur Doerksen publishes he makes common complaints sound extraordinary and he goes out of his way to use Dr. Clark's name to promote his products -- thereby inferring an affiliation with Dr. Clark. Arthur Doerksen has been doing this kind of marketing for the past 14 years. For the past 13 years I have pointed out that Dr. Clark states on her own website that she is not affiliated with any zapper manufacturer and that she does not endorse any maker or any products. Zapper makers who use her name do so without her consent, according to Dr. Clark herself. Arthur Doerksen has been using Dr. Clark's name prominently on his site for the past 14 years -- complete with photos of Dr. Clark and "Me and Dr. Clark" stories after he visited her clinic.
Conditions that are strictly associated with parasites or other pathogens (warts are actually viruses) can often be resolved quickly by zapping. But Arthur Doerksen makes no mention in his promotional material about the need for detoxification, hormone supplementation and mineralization for serious illnesses. If you are seriously ill and follow a protocol such as the one I elaborate in My Recovery Protocol the immune system can revitalize and maintain itself naturally, as God intended it to do. A healthy immune system doesn't need a temporary external boost to provide the illusion of good health.
GETTING TO THE ROOT OF THE PROBLEM
Although Arthur Doerksen talks about "Health in a Hurry" regarding his Auto-Zap 5. Unfortunately, there is no such thing as health in a hurry when you have a serious illness. This is an irresponsible claim. It is pandering to those demanding quick results. In his promotional material Arthur Doerksen acknowledges that this was his motivation in developing the Auto-Zap 5. He says people were clammering for quick results so he set about to develop a zapper he could claim gives fast results -- which resulted in the creation of the Auto-Zap 5 for which he makes serious claims without any proof whatsoever for their veracity.
The Ultimate Zapper has been giving fast results for 14 years, often after only 30 seconds to 1 minute, according to people submitting unsolicited testimonials that you can read in The Archive on this site. Here is how one customer compares The Auto-Zap to The Ultimate Zapper:
"Hi Ken,
I just noticed that Arthur Doerksen has come out with a new device. I have read
the comments about it and him on your site. I was confused by his comments that
many frequencies were operating at once. What does he mean? Anyway, my original
zapper was his AutoZap, which was effective enough to cure my boy of Candida (it
took three months of zapping twice a day) but, since I have been using your Ultimate
Zapper, I realize how much more powerful it is. I have stopped pain in my body within
minutes with it. One last question: I bought my Ultimate Zapper over a year ago.
Has anything changed in the device since then? Thanks so much for your efforts to
improve the zapper.
Brent K.
Feb. 20, 2010"
Fast results may mean permanent results in the case of illnesses that are strictly related to parasites or other opportunistic pathogens but fast results, if they are indeed obtainable at all, do not mean permanent results if the condition being treated is caused by underlying toxicity and hormonal and mineral depletion. I let people know in My Recovery Protocol that they have to get to the root of the problem before they can recover completely from serious illness. Otherwise, they can expect only temporary progress. When Arthur Doerksen claims the Auto-Zap 5 "wakes up the immune system" he makes false and misleading medical claims. The fact is that there is no short-cut to really "waking up" the immune system.
ARTHUR DOERKSEN COPIES THE ULTIMATE ZAPPER
I notice that Arthur Doerksen has copied The Ultimate Zapper. He claims that the Auto-Zap 5 has a "constant 10-volt output" -- from 2 AA batteries, not from an AC adapter. The Ultimate Zapper has had a constant output of 10.5 volts for 13 years thanks to its AC adapter. Producing a constant output with batteries is impossible. You will get 10 volts at the start of zapping with 2 AA batteries but the batteries discharge and they do not maintain a "constant 10-volt output" for very long at all. Arthur Doerksen's statement about "constant output" is misleading and clearly false.
I also notice that Arthur Doerksen has copied The Ultimate Zapper's recommendation that footpads should be used along with handholds for optimum results. On his site you can see Arthur Doerksen zapping with home-made aluminum foil footpads. Aluminum is a poor conductor of electric current compared to stainless steel and copper -- he should know this since he is an electrical engineer. But, in fact, Arthur Doerksen has been complaining on his site for 14 years that footpads cost more to ship than it costs you to buy them at a local sheet metal shop so he has never sold them and never actively promoted their use. As I discuss on my site, footpads improve results greatly -- they "greatly help" according to Dr. Hulda Clark. Arthur Doerksen still doesn't sell footpads but it looks like his attitude has changed toward them with the introduction of his new Auto-Zap 5 because he now actively promotes their use since he now sells wires and clips that he recommends users attach to footpads. But they still have to go out and purchase the footpads themselves. I see that Arthur Doerksen has also copied The Ultimate Zapper's solid copper clips.
I also notice that Arthur Doerksen offers a 1-year trial that certainly looks impressive -- until you read the fine print and see that there are "no returns on Zappicators due to personal nature of device". Whatever "personal nature of device" means he does not explain. The important point is that his Zappicator -- no returns accepted -- just happens to be the largest part of the new Auto-Zap 5. Well, so much for Arthur Doerksen's claim that he offers "The longest risk-free trial period ever offered - one full YEAR". I also notice that there are no returns on his SuperStraps either. I also find it highly ironic that Arthur Doerksen now sells wrist straps -- he calls them SuperStraps -- with his new Auto-Zap 5. Dr. Clark does not recommend wrist straps and Arthur Doerksen himself, echoing Dr. Clark's recommendation, argued strongly against them for 14 years on his site and had a section devoted to this matter on his site that emphasized the lack of effectiveness of wrist straps.
Arthur Doerksen calls his new Auto-Zap 5 zapper "a real bargain ... we've kept the cost low..." Kept the cost low? The new Auto-Zap 5 "wellness system" costs $419.00 dollars plus shipping. His zapper alone is $289.00 plus shipping. The Ultimate Zapper is $189.95 plus shipping.
THE TERMINATOR II SYNDROME
The Auto-Zap 5 is found among the common zappers in Chart #1 of the 5 Zapper Comparison Charts on this site. Arthur Doerksen claimed for 14 years that the old Auto-Zap was the "best zapper" partly because of its one single feature -- its low frequency -- that he touted as being far superior to higher frequencies and that he claimed even Dr. Clark herself recognized as being far more effective than high frequencies. Surprisingly, and very ironically, Arthur Doerksen's new Auto-Zap 5 actually features the less effective high frequency. Arthur Doerksen does not explain how changing to a less effective frequency produces a better zapper and how his Auto-Zap with its low frequency can also be called the "best zapper".
Arthur Doerksen has added a coil to the Auto-Zap 5 which he claims makes it superior. The Terminator II from Don Croft also has a coil. It has had a coil for years and it looks like it has some other impressive features, as well, but The Charts show it has only 1 of the 11 features that make zappers effective -- its single low frequency. Read what 2 practitioners have to say about the Terminator II's effectiveness.
TESTIMONIALS
"Hi Ken, ... I bought 6 Terminators from Croft and gave them to patients and friends to try. Feedback was "no noticeable results, no improvement, nada nada ..." so I was very disappointed ..." Aloha, Allen and Sharie, Mar. 4, 2007
"Dear Ken, I am interested in your zappers as well as in becoming a distributor ... I would like to start with 3 to begin with. I have used the Croft Terminator zapper with absolutely no benefits at all, and eventually had to return it ... "
Thanks and best wishes, Imran R., May 19, 2007
AUTO-ZAP 5 ACTUALLY LOOKS LIKE
TERMINATOR I
As far as features are concerned the Auto-Zap 5 looks like a scaled-down version of the Terminator II. It looks like a Terminator I. But, according to Arthur Doerksen it is the best zapper available. But according to him the old Auto-Zap was "the best". Now Arthur Doerksen showers the new Auto-Zap 5 with accolades that he attributes to 4 years of "field testing" -- even before the Auto-Zap 5 has hit the marketplace -- and before he explains what 4 years of "field testing" entailed. He seems to be saying that 4 years of "field testing" is all the proof anyone needs -- and we should just take his word for it -- without any testimonials or other evidence to support his "testing" claim. Vagueness is typical of the marketing practices of many zapper makers. For example, David Etheredge of ParaZapper refers to "surveys" he has taken of ParaZapper users. He publishes the results of those "surveys" but consistently refuses to disclose any details at all about the surveys themselves. Many zapper makers hang a BIG NEON SIGN out front but offer no details, documentation or proof to back up the flashing lights and bright colors. Arthur Doerksen is not unique in this regard, as I point out on this page and other pages on this site.
Arthur Doerksen claims a "lifetime of wellness" for users of the Auto-Zap 5. This is an amazing categorical medical claim to make -- which is totally unsubstantiated by him. Since his new zapper has not even been on the market for 2 weeks he is unable to substantiate his claims with testimonials because customers have not had the opportunity to use the Auto-Zap 5 for any length of time -- let alone sufficient time for him to claim "a lifetime of wellness". You would think that, with 4 years of "field testing" allegedly backing the launch of his Auto-Zap 5, Arthur Doerksen would be eager to provide as much information as possible to support his claims. But, astonishingly, he provides no details at all.
THE SACRED DR. CLARK CYCLE
We read about Arthur Doerksen's claim of quick results for the new Auto-Zap 5 -- it "wakes up your immune system ... in 5 minutes flat you are done" then we read contradictory statements that talk about the Auto-Zap 5 offering 5 different zapping cycles including a 1-hour cycle.
What is odd about all this is that Arthur Doerksen insisted for 14 years that Dr. Clark's 7-20-7-20-7 cycle was sacred and that Auto-Zap was the "best zapper" and it only used the 7-minute "Dr. Clark Cycle". Now the sacred "Dr. Clark Cycle" has been thrown out the window -- replaced by "Health in a hurry in 5 minutes flat" -- that requires a lifetime of daily use -- with 5 different cycles in a new more expensive model that you have to buy because the old Auto-Zap that was "the best" has just become obsolete. According to Arthur Doerksen the Auto-Zap doesn't even rank anymore -- yet he continues to call it the "best zapper". Strange. According to him, it's a whole new ballgame now.
I have never programmed cycles into The Ultimate Zapper because I recognized 13 years ago that everyone is different and that while 30 seconds or 1 minute is perfect for some people others need the 7-20-7-20-7 cycle, others need 5-20-5-20-5, others need 10-20-10-20-10, etcetera. There is no sacred cycle -- no "one size fits all". Everyone is different and each case is different. I have always advised people to start slow and to experiment to see what works best for them. Many people who use The Ultimate Zapper report they only need to zap for 30 seconds or 1 minute to obtain excellent results. Amazingly, some need only 15 seconds. But I make no claims regarding zapping duration and results and the fact is that no zapper maker can honestly make any guarantees regarding zapping duration or results because everyone's constitution is different, every illness is different and each case is unique. This is especially true regarding serious illness. The instructions for The Ultimate Zapper are online here.
CONTRADICTORY STATEMENTS
and CATEGORICAL CLAIMS
When you examine Arthur Doerksen statements on his site there are many contraditions to be seen. Contradictory statements and categorical claims must be viewed with a great deal of caution, in my opinion. He also states "With the Auto-Zap 5 Wellness System", you won't be at the mercy of a crumbling, costly "sickness care" system that thinks drugs are the answer to health problems." He doesn't explain what he means by this. Does he mean that antibiotics are no longer effective for serious bacterial infections (for example, for heliobacter pylori that causes stomach ulcers)? Does he mean that you shouldn't get an operation if you need one? What happens if you have an attack of accute appendicitis? Should you sit home and zap? Does he mean all you need is the Auto-Zap 5because it constitutes a "wellness system? What exactly does he mean by this? What exactly is this "wellness system" that he refers to? Does he mean that the Auto-Zap 5 is actually a "system" -- not merely a common zapper -- and that it replaces the "medical system" which is now a thing of the past? No explanation is forthcoming about all of these broad statements and their implications from Arthur Doerksen. Not a word. My advice: caveat emptor. May the buyer beware -- not only the buyer of products but, more importantly, the buyer of ideas.
DANGEROUS ADVICE
I followed dangerous advice in 1993 when I needed an operation. It nearly cost me my life. I had an operation for Crohn's disease that saved my life at St. Paul's Hospital in Vancouver on April 5, 1994. When I was dying in 1993 the "master" alternative practitioner whose advice I was taking assured me that I would be fine under his expert care. All I needed to do was spend more money and "wellness" would be mine. He put my life at risk while I was in a desperate state of health and in a very desperate situation. I was lucky to get to the operating table just in time to save my life. After I recovered I went back to him and demanded a portion of my money back And I got it. I told him he had no business making the assurances and claims he had been making.
The bottom line: zapping can be wonderful for many things, zapping with The Ultimate Zapper has even saved people from undergoing the knife, but zapping is not the be all and end all for everyone in all cases. When Arthur Doerksen talks about a "lifetime of wellness" the red flag goes straight up the pole for me. This is a categorical and unsubstantiated medical claim. I cannot think of a more serious health claim one could make for one's product. In my opinion, it is a very dangerous claim -- one that carries great moral hazard and that places a heavy burden of proof on Arthur Doerksen for making it. He has failed to provide the necessary proof. The motto of the story is to be careful who you listen to. First and foremost, listen to your own inner voice and don't hesitate to see your doctor when you need to.
THE MEDICAL SYSTEM
Having said that, I am personally not a great fan of the "medical system"-- as a "system" -- as you know by reading this site. But I do have enough common sense to know when to turn to a medical doctor for help when I need it. I know that when zapping will not do the trick you should listen to your own inner voice. That's God trying to help you make the right decision. For instance, if you have a serious illness like peptic ulcers or pneumonia, or another illness that does not respond to zapping you may need some antibiotics or other medical treatment. Zapping would have been useless for me when I needed an operaiton. You should not hesitate to put your zapper down and call your doctor when you need to. The Ultimate Zapper has done real wonders for so many people for so many different kinds of illnesses and diseases for over 13 years as the 300 testimonials in the archive show. But I would be foolish to make any categorical claims for it and I would never tell anyone not to call their doctor if they need to. Pandering to anti-establishment sentiment may not be in the best interest of the health of everyone. In fact, it may be highly dangerous advice.
The way Arthur Doerksen tells it you will no longer "be at the mercy" of the medical system if you buy his Auto-Zap 5. I believe this is a very foolish statement to make. The Ultimate Zapper has cleared up many illnesses but I would never say that you are at "the mercy" of an antiobiotic if it helps resolve a serous health condition or that you are at the mercy of a surgeon if he saves your life. Years ago I was traveling and did not have my zapper with me. I contracted bronchitis after weeks on the road overseas during monsoon season. I went to the doctor, took antibiotics and was well again after a short time. Personally, I was grateful for the antibiotics and was certainly not gnashing my teeth after I got well about being at the "mercy" of a "crumbling sickness care system". In my opinion, this kind of talk is simply pandering to anti-establishment sentiment in order to boost sales.
Oh, I just read the very fine print at the bottom of Arthur Doerksen's page "... We do not ... make medical claims." This sounds like David Amrein and his Dr. Clark Research Association and the Dr. Clark Information Center all over again -- make all the claims you want in bold print then disclaim them later in the fine print. All of a sudden "a lifetime of wellness" has vanished in front of our eyes. Never mind, I'm sure this will all get sorted out when David Amrein of the Dr. Clark Research Association reports Arthur Doerksen's medical claims to Health Canada. I don't know why but David Amrein seems to have something against Canadians. See #2 above for more about this and David Amrein's Dr. Clark Research Association.
THE BEST ZAPPER? REALLY? LET'S TAKE
A CLOSE LOOK AT THE AUTO-ZAP and AUTO-ZAP 5
Arthur Doerksen used to call his Auto-Zap "the best zapper" -- before he came out with his new Auto-Zap 5 model. He used to call the Auto-Zap the "Rolls-Royce of zappers". But now that he has a new model for sale he may have to change the description of the Auto-Zap to "the next best zapper". And he may have to choose a different brand of motor vehicle to compare it to. I used to call the Auto-Zap "The Edsel" -- for reasons explained here -- but he may want to use a different brand to compare it to instead -- like the Pontiac or Corvette. The promotional material for his new Auto-Zap 5 states that "... this new system changes everything about Hulda Clark zapping ..." Notice how Arthur Doerksen has introduced Dr. Clark into the conversation as he has been doing for the past 14 years despite her explicit statements that she does not endorse any product or any maker.
The Auto-Zap 5 "changes everything"? Not really, as you can read above --but that's what Arthur Doerksen would like everyone to believe. He says that "... millions more will use it ..." I had no idea that millions had used his original Auto-Zap. This is astonishing. Business was obviously much better than I had thought. ParaZapper used to claim that he was #1 in sales on Curezone -- a health forum where manufacturers are forbidden from promoting their product -- unless, like ParaZapper's David Etheredge, they curry favor with the moderator -- in which case they receive special exemption. But after this revelation by Arthur Doerksen about "millions more" I guess that David Etheredge of ParaZapper will have to revise his idea about who is really #1 in zapper sales. Arthur Doerksen's definition of "the best zapper" used to be the one that is "most easy to use". I wonder what his new definition of the "best zapper" is now? It looks like the users of the old Auto-Zap will have to discard it and place an order for the new Auto-Zap 5 because the old Auto-Zap has apparently just become obsolete. Built-in obsolesence is not part of my marketing strategy for The Ultimate Zapper. It still remains the best zapper after 13 years.
According to Arthur Doerksen's earlier definition the "best zapper" is the one that is "most easy to use" - and only the Auto-Zap qualified for that highest of accolades -- according to Arthur Doerksen. But in fact all zappers are easy to use. You just turn the switch on and zap. I have never seen a zapper that is not easy to use. My definition of "the best zapper" is the one that is the most effective. And this means a zapper that has special features that make it the most effective. There are 11 features that make zappers effective. Arthur Doerksen's Auto-Zap has only 1 of the 11, its low frequency. The Ultimate Zapper has all 11.
How effective is a 1-feature battery-powered zapper? Not very effective. Arthur Doerksen had to find a way to make his zapper sound more impressive than it really is. So he created a definition of "the best zapper" that allowed him to call his Auto-Zap "the best". For him "the best" = "the most easy to use". However, for most people that would not be the definition of "the best zapper". Most people think of effectiveness when they think of "the best zapper" -- the one that provides the best results. The Auto-Zap is not even a candidate for being "the best zapper" with its single feature under this definition. Arthur Doerksen's definition is self-serving. It simply allows him to promote the Auto-Zap as " the best zapper" without referring to effectiveness. His use of the word "best" constitutes deceptive marketing.
Arthur Doerksen's zapper comparison chart compares 7 zappers. He says they "are compared by published specifications ..." A closer look reveals the "specifications" in his chart are not specifications at all. Telephone support, automatic shut-off, battery beeper alert, handholds, etc., are not specifications at all. They are simply marketing features -- "bells and whistles". Arthur Doerksen's use of the word "specifications" is deceptive.
Compare The Ultimate Zapper chart with the Auto-Zap chart on This Page. It is clear Auto-Zap has 1 feature and 6 non-features. Arthur Doerksen omits the 10 additional features that make zappers effective from the Auto-Zap chart because Auto-Zap doesn't have them. If it did you can bet your bottom dollar they would be in his chart. The Ultimate Zapper has them all and they are in my 5 Comparison Charts that compare 29 popular zappers.
Incidently, it is not surprising that Auto-Zap has never been noted by anyone on Curezone as an effective zapper in all the years the forum has been running, unlike The Ultimate Zapper.
MARKETING PRACTICES
Arthur Doerksen indulges in unethical marketing to promote his Auto-Zap. His marketing strategy is based on using Dr. Clark's name prominently (plus photos and stories) to promote his Dr. Hulda Clark Products. He infers Dr. Clark approves Auto-Zap in spite of the fact she states on her website, " ... I do not endorse any manufacturer."
On my site I refer to Dr. Clark's research. I do not use her name to promote The Ultimate Zapper. She is not affiliated with me and has not approved or endorsed The Ultimate Zapper. It has stood on its own merits since 1996.
Below his zapper chart Arthur Doerksen makes false statements and indulges in fear-mongering to try to discourage people from buying The Ultimate Zapper. He has been doing this since 1996. I refute his statements and discuss his deceptive marketing practices below and on This Page.
I notice that Arthur Doerksen has recently copied the phrase "healing power" from the Home Page of my site to bolster the image of Auto-Zap, but without any proof whatsoever for this adopted claim. It is not the phrase that makes the difference, it is the truth behind it that gives it real meaning, as you can see by reading my site.
Below you can view:
1. The single chart from Arthur Doerksen's site that includes The Ultimate Zapper. I have adapted the size of his chart to fit the more narrow format of my site. Some of the graphics of the Auto-Zap chart would not copy to this page but the content is identical to the chart on his site.
2. Chart 3 of 5 zapper Comparison Charts from my site that includes the Auto-Zap.
Compare the charts. It is clear that the features on my chart are the features that make zappers effective. They are true features. Arthur's chart has only one true feature, the "positively-offset output voltage" (the square wave). But all zappers have this "feature" because this is the feature that creates a zapper. It is a "universal" zapper feature. Arthur's chart might as well say that the zapper box and wires are features. Every zapper has them. All the other "features" in his chart are "bells and whistles". They are not true features that help make zappers more effective. It is clear why I call Arthur's chart a "bells and whistles" chart. The Auto-Zap chart is really featureless. So, the Auto-Zap is virtually featureless, as well, unless you consider "bells and whistles" features, which I do not.
When you look at my chart it is easy to see the difference with Arthur's chart. You can compare The Ultimate Zapper with the Auto-Zap based on substance, 11 true features, not "bells and whistles". There are no bells or whistles in my charts. I discuss the so-called features of the Auto-Zap and Arthur Doerksen's false statements, his deceptive marketing and his fear-mongering below and on the Auto-Zap & Silver Terminator Page.
There is one additional matter regarding false information about The Ultimate Zapper found on the Auto-Zap site. Contrary to what Arthur Doerksen writes about The Ultimate Zapper regarding telephone support I provide expert telephone support 365 days of the year. In fact, no matter where you are in the world just email me your number and I will be glad to pay for the call. This is stated on the front page of my site. Unlike Arthur Doerksen I also provide free telephone support for all international customers, not only for American and Canadian customers.
| Feature |
Auto- Zap |
DCRA Zapper DeLuxe 2006 Bio- Wave |
Para zapper CCa |
A6 Zapper |
Generic devices |
The Ultimate Zapper |
Termin- ator II |
| 100% Positively -offset output voltage |
 |
|
|
|
 |
|
|
| Copper handles included (per Dr. Clark's recommendation) |
|
 |
|
|
|
|
|
| Extreme battery life (over 500 hours on a 9 volt battery) |
|
(about 20 hours) |
|
(about 15 hours) |
|
|
|
| Confirmation of proper current flow (e.g. the SenseLED on the Auto-Zap) |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Automatic timing and shutoff |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Output protected against static shock damage |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
| Expert telephone support |
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
Below the Zapper Chart on the Auto-Zap site
are comments by Arthur Doerksen that I have highlighted below in
blue with my response in red.
Arthur Doerksen:
Superior (Super) Stabilized Wave
This is a marketing term invented by the DCRA to describe the removal of a current-limiting
stage in the output of the Super Zapper DeLuxe zapper models. This current limiting
was intended by Dr. Hulda Clark to prevent tissue damage. Removing it is not a benefit,
and is not endorsed or approved by Dr. Clark, who prefers that her devices be unconditionally
safe and effective.
Ken Presner:
The Super Stabilized square wave is not only a marketing term, it is an actual change
made to the square wave that greatly improves zapping results. Typical of how Arthur
Doerksen uses deceptive practices to market his Auto-Zap is the comment removal
of current limiting "to prevent tissue damage". He engages in fear-mongering in
many instances on his site and this is just one example. There is no evidence whatsoever
that the Super Stabilized square wave or any other square wave that generates a
frequency of less than 1 million Hertz has any negative effect on human tissue.
On the contrary, Dr. Clark herself stated that the zapper's wave cannot damage human
tissue because zapper frequencies are far below the resonant frequencies of human
tissue. I have sold thousands of Ultimate Zappers in the past 13 years. There has
not been one single report that I have received about tissue damage. You can see
time and again where Arthur Doerksen tries to denigrate the features that The Ultimate
Zapper offers because his Auto-Zap does not have them. He resorts to technical mumbo-jumbo
to try to convince people that they are of no value, which is entirely false.
Arthur Doerksen:
Superior Harmonics
This is another marketing term which has led some
people to believe that harmonics are a desirable feature in a Zapper. It is a claim
based on the removal of the current limiting resistance as noted above, producing
a sharper waveform.
Ken Presner:
Dr. Hulda Clark herself has
stated that harmonic frequencies are an important factor in increasing zapper effectiveness.
Arthur Doerksen wants people to believe that they are merely a "marketing term"
and nothing more. The well-known electronics expert Dr. Richard Loyd has recognized
the importance of harmonics and David Overman of Harmonic Quad has, as well, although
his zapper does not produce any harmonics, according to the testing done by Dr.
Howard May. Once again, here is an example of Arthur Doerksen denigrating an important
feature offered by The Ultimate Zapper because he offers no proof that his Auto-Zap
produces any harmonics, let alone superior harmonics. Once again, he tries to convince
people that harmonics are of no value in the face of all the evidence to the contrary.
He resorts to a quick, authoritative-sounding one-liner with no evidence whatsoever
to back up is statement. Because there is none.
Arthur Doerksen:
Electroporation
The idea of using a Zapper for electroporation therapy is uninformed nonsense, as
the voltages involved (typically 10,000 - 100,000 volts per cm are far too high
for any home use device, much less a safe, effective Zapper designed to Dr. Clark's
specifications.
Ken Presner:
The only "uninformed nonsense" here is the statement by
Arthur Doerksen, one more example of how he attempts to use technical mumbo-jumobo
to try to convince people that he knows what he is talking about. He does not. He
has no idea about this because, quite obviously, his Auto-Zap does not produce an
Electroporation effect. If it did the would be singing a different tune altogether,
you can be assured of that. The Electroporation Page on this site not only provides
a wealth of scientific information regarding the Electroporation effect of patented
zappers, it also has 12 Electroporation testimonials from the Testimonial Archive
on this site that show beyond any doubt whatsoever that The Ultimate Zapper produces
a very strong Electroporation effect. I have experienced that effect personally
and I talk about my experience on the Electroporation Page. Once again, Arthur Doerksen
resorts to a quick, authoritative-sounding one-liner with no evidence whatsoever
to back up his statement. Because there is none. There is a mountain of scientific
evidence proving the Electroporation effect and I provide many of these links to
that evidence on the Electroporation Page.
Arthur Doerksen:
AC Adapter
We purposely do not include an AC adapter because the potential for catastrophic
failure and electric shock would undo all the good we are accomplishing with the
Zapper.
Ken Presner:
"Catastrophic ... electric shock ... undo all the good"
Here, in its crowning glory, is the most famous of all of Arthur Doerksen's fear-mongering statements about The Ultimate Zapper. His statement comes complete with not a scintilla of proof for its veracity, as usual. Arthur Doerksen has had this statement on his site for 13 years trying to scare people out of their socks before that can even think of buying The Ultimate Zapper. He has not succeeded. If there had been any truth at all to his statement you can be sure that negative reports would have been on the internet years ago and The Ultimate Zapper would have been discredited and would have disappeared from the zapper world long ago. This has not happened. For one reason. Arthur Doerksen' statement is false. In fact, the only report that you will find anywhere, including the internet, that talks about the horrible things that will happen if you use The Ultimate Zapper with its AC adapter is the fear-mongering statement from Arthur Doerksen. He has a very large ax to grind and has been busy grinding it for 13 years.
Years ago I posted a reply to Arthur Doerksen's fear-mongering statements about The Ultimate Zapper's AC adapter in #16 and #17 on the FAQ page of this site. Included is a statement on Curezone posted by an electrical engineer supporting the absolute safety of The Ultimate Zapper's AC adapter. Arthur Doerksen has never responded to my statements or to the statements of this fellow electrical engineer. Not surprising. In 13 years there has never been a single report back about any incident, even the slightest incident, regarding The Ultimate Zapper's AC adapter. And there never will be. In fact many zapper makers have followed my lead and now also provide an AC adapter. The Ultimate Zapper was the first zapper in the world to offer an AC adapter.
COMMENTARY
Ken Presner:
Through the years Arthur Doerksen has attempted to find ways to disguise the fact that Auto-Zap is a 1-feature zapper. He has tried to find ways to elevate it in the mind's eye of prospective customers by making it sound exceptional. The fact is that it is a very common 1-feature zapper -- its low frequency-- with some bells and whistles added. This is clear by looking at the zapper Comparison Charts on this site and by reading the discussion above and on the Auto-Zap & Silver Terminator Page. Arthur Doerksen uses a number of marketing techiques to inflate Auto-Zap and a number of negative marketing techniques to talk down The Ultimate Zapper, his major competitor. I outline these techniques below:
1. Arthur Doerksen uses the term "professional" to describe Auto-Zap because he is an electrical engineer. His attempt to transfer his professional status to his zapper fails because the term "professional" is unsupported by the actual features that the Zuto-Zap offers. It is thus a marketing term and nothing more that Arthur Doerksen uses to try to elevate the 1-feature Auto-Zap into a higher category. He does not succeed.
Furthermore, being a professional electrical engineer is actually a handicap in the zapper world, not an asset. Let me explain. The actual electronic knowledge required to make a zapper is not that complicated. You don't have to be an Albert Einstein in electronics to put things together on the technical side once you have the concept for a better zapper. It is the concept that makes the difference, not the specialized knowledge of resistors and capacitors that can be learned quite easily by nearly anyone.
The problem with being a professional electrical engineer in the zapper world is that the imagination is limited by professional training that keeps the electronic mind inside the conventional electronic box. Being outside that electronic box is a great advantage because the imagination is unfettered. ParaZapper's David Etheredge is also an electrical engineer who is very much inside the conventional electronic box as well, like Arthur Doerksen. I find it interesting that both have gone out of their way to make false statements about The Ultimate Zapper. Their tone shows that they appear to be miffed that an inventor who is not a professional electrical engineer could create a zapper that is better than theirs.
2. Arthur Doerksen's attitude toward Dr. Clark is reverential. Mine is not, as I discuss on the Dr. Clark page on this site. Arthur Doerksen uses Dr. Clark's name without her permission to promote his "Dr. Clark products". Dr. Clark states on her site that she is not affiliated with and does not endorse any zapper maker or any zapper. This has never deterred Arthur Doerksen. (Nor has it deterred David Amrein of the Dr. Clark Research Association or ParaZapper's David Etheredge.) The gist is that using Dr. Clark's name is somehow supposed to elevate Arthur Doerksen's Auto-Zap above the 1-feature category. It does not. How can it? First of all, the affilation is a false one. Second of all, 1 feature is still 1 feature no matter how you slice it.
3. Since Auto-Zap has only 1 feature Arthur Doerksen has to do something to try to make it look like Auto-Zap has important features that make it look better than other zappers. So, he created some bells and whistles to create that impression. The only problem is that they have nothing to do with zapper effectiveness. They have merely been added to his 1-feature zapper to make it appear that Auto-Zap is more than it is. How can it be more than it is? Auto-Zap's bells and whistles consist of a beeper alert, automatic timing and shut-off, protection against static shock damage and confirmation of proper current flow with a sensor-LED:
a. The beeper alert is indeed useful for some users: for blind users it lets them know the zapping cycle is over. For everyone else this is a bell and whistle. Most users are quite capable of shutting off their zappers without being beeped.
b. The automatic timer and shut-off is completely counter-productive. Many people who use The Ultimate Zapper are very sensitive and need to zap for only 30 seconds or one minute to get full results. More than one minute puts some sensitive people into the "uncomfortable zone". Some people like to zap for up to one hours at a stretch. Having a timer based on Dr. Clark's 7-minute formula would make it impossible for user's to zap according to their individual needs. Arthur Doerksen does not address the issue of user sensitivity because Auto-Zap is so weak that this issue never arises with Auto-Zap.
c. In all the 13 years that I have had my site and have been selling The Ultimate Zapper I have never heard a single word mentioned about "static shock", except from Arthur Doerksen. This is truly a paper tiger bell and whistle. He adds this technical feature to his Auto-Zap to make it look substantial -- a "feature" that contributes absolutely nothing to zapper effectiveness. This is a non-feature and a paper tiger at that because static shock is a non-issue. By making it seem like it is a real issue and then addressing that issue he makes it look like something important is going on. Something important is going on. What is going on is the creation of a distraction.
d. Let's look at Auto-Zap's sensor-LED. The Ultimate Zapper's sensor-LED also confirms correct current flow but I never discuss this as being a feature because it is not. It is simply a specification that all zappers should have. It contributes absolutely nothing to zapper effectiveness. It is another bell and whistle that Arthur Doerksen touts as a "feature" on his "feature chart".
Ironically, the only feature that Auto-Zap does have is not even on his chart -- the low frequency. I find this ironic because you would think that he would want to show Auto-Zap's 1 real feature on his own chart. He does not, which leads me to believe one of the following possibilities:
a) He does not consider it very important because so many other zappers, including The Ultimate Zapper, have a low frequency. I don't believe that this possibility is very likely.
b) The more likely possibility is that he does not want people to see that Auto-Zap has only 1 feature, a feature that Auto-Zap shares with so many other zappers. If people saw on his chart that Auto-Zap's low frequency is also shared by many of the prominent zappers on his chart, including The Ultimate Zapper, it would make Auto-Zap look very common. So, his chart features Auto-Zap's non-features (the bells and whistles) that other zappers, including The Ultimate Zapper do not "feature" because they are not features at all. His attempt to make his chart look like a real feature comparison chart is a failure because it is clear it is designed to highlight the "non-features" that are exclusive to his Auto-Zap to make Auto-Zap look special rather than common. This does not change the fact that Auto-Zap is a common 1-feature zapper.
4. Arthur Doerksen's zapper comparison chart is also misleading for 3 more reasons. There are 3 "features" on the chart that have nothing at all to do with zapper output: the copper handles, battery life and telephone support. It is clear that none of these 3 "features" has anything to do with zapper effectiveness. Nor are they even specifications. Regarding telephone support, Arthur Doerksen falsely states that The Ultimate Zapper does not offer expert telephone support.
The fact is that not only do I provide telephone support to my customers, my telephone support is more comprehensive than his because I provide free telephone support even for international customers. Arthur Doerksen has refused to remove this false statment about telephone support from his chart as he has refused to remove all the false statements about The Ultimate Zapper from his site. I find this especially ironic because years ago Arthur Doerksen contacted me about a small error on my site. I checked his information, found that he was correct, and quickly made the change on my site.
5. Arthur Doerksen uses the negative marketing technique of fear-mongering to discourage people from purchasing The Ultimate Zapper. He has not succeeded. I discuss his fear-mongering above and on the Auto-Zap Silver terminator page on this site.
6. Arthur Doerksen calls his zapper the "best zapper" which is also the name he uses for his site. There is nothing in fact that justifies this claim. At best the only truthful claim he could possibly make for his Auto-Zap is that it is the "best 1-feature zapper".
Below is Comparison Chart #3 from
The Ultimate Zapper's Chart Page.
It includes the Auto-Zap.
|
CHART 1 |
|||||||
|
|
THE
|
Syncro Zap A-6 in Dr. Clark's Clinic |
Deluxe Model A-6 Hulda Clark Zapper |
Termi- nator
II
|
Silver Termi- nator |
Auto- Zap zapper |
Auto- |
|
PROFILE |
SINGLE |
Single |
Single |
Single |
Single | Single |
Single |
|
near 100%
DUTY CYCLE |
YES |
50% |
50% |
50% |
50% |
50% |
50% |
|
SUPER
STABILIZED
WAVE
|
YES |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
CONSTANT
HIGH VOLTAGE
AC ADAPTER |
YES |
No |
No |
No |
optional |
No |
high |
|
PURE
SQUARE WAVE |
YES |
No |
No |
No |
only with adapter |
No |
No |
|
CONSTANT
HIGH
CONDUCTIVITY |
YES |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
FOOT
PADS |
YES |
No |
No |
No |
No |
recom- |
recom- |
|
LOW
FREQUENCY |
YES |
No |
No
|
Yes |
Yes |
Yes |
No |
|
SUPERIOR
HARMONICS |
YES |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
BLOOD
ELECTRI-
FICATION |
YES |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
ELECTRO-
PORATION |
YES |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
AURA EXPANSION |
YES |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
No |
|
TRIAL OFFER |
YES |
No |
No |
No |
No |
Yes |
1-year |
|
WARRANTY |
YES |
No warranty |
No |
No warranty |
No warranty |
5-year warranty |
partial |
|
|
$189 |
$99 to $165 |
$294 |
$124 |
$280 |
$160 |
$289 |
FALSE STATEMENTS
AND FEAR-MONGERING
Below his 7-zapper comparison chart Arthur Doerksen makes false and misleading statements about 5 of The Ultimate Zapper's features. Ironically, and not by accident, these 5 features don't even appear in Arthur Doerksen's Auto-Zap chart: the Super Stabilized wave, the near 100% duty cycle (which he refers to as the "Constant Wave"), the frequency (inferred), harmonics, electroporation and the AC adapter. Below his chart Arthur also indulges in fear-mongering about The Ultimate Zapper. No surprise. He has been doing this for the past 13 years and I have been refuting him for the past 13 years. I refute each of his false statements below. I also address his latest episode of fear-mongering -- prominently placed below his chart.
1. Arthur Doerksen of the Auto-Zap states: " ... the [Ultimate Zapper's] "Constant Wave" actually prevents this natural alteration of the zapper waveform into the ideal [rounded] waveform, actually reducing effectiveness of the zapper while increasing risk of damage to delicate tissues." Before this fear-mongering statement he mistakenly refers to the 100% duty cycle by calling it the "Constant Wave". He further refers to "Dr. Clark's ideal zapper waveform" as being a rounded wave.
a) Well, this is quite a mouth-full. He mixes 3 features into a fearful brew. He infers that a near 100% Duty Cycle ("Constant Wave") is dangerous and when it is stabilized it will somehow overcome the completely safe low frequency of 2,500 Hertz and create a fearsome square wave that can damage tissues. This convoluted Arthur Doerksen creation is total fiction for which he provides absolutely no proof, because there is none. On the contrary, the superior therapeutic value of a high Duty Cycle was proved by a scientific study of a patented zapper. The study emphasized the importance of a high "Duty Cycle [88% or higher] multiplied by voltage" to create deep tissue penetration. When The Ultimate Zapper's 10.5 volts are factored into the equation tissue penetration is far deeper than with any other zapper. Its square wave kills pathogens that weak zappers such as the Auto-Zap cannot even reach. The 368 testimonials prove this beyond a shadow of a doubt.
b) Nowhere does Dr. Clark herself refer to a rounded square wave as "her ideal wave form". Arthur Doerksen creates this notion because it is the Auto-Zap's wave form, his "ideal waveform".
c) It is quite natural for a square wave to become round if it is not stabilized. But nowhere does Dr. Clark state that round is "ideal". Arthur Doerksen is the one who declares round is "ideal". Round is not ideal. The ideal wave form is one that stays square "under load", i.e. with body contact, because the square wave is much more effective when it is stabilized. A more effective wave is "ideal" according to how I think. There is no doubt that when the wave is square within the body it is much more effective than when it is round. This fact was underscored when there was a tremendous upsurge in positive testimonials after I added the Super Stabilized square wave to The Ultimate Zapper years ago. Stabilization technology is expensive. Which is why most zapper makers don't even mention it let alone add it to their zappers. Arthur Doerksen never used to mention the stabilized wave until I introduced it and it started to have a serious impact in the zapper market. Arthur Doerksen's answer to the stabilized wave is to try to debunk it.
d) Nowhere does Dr. Clark state that stabilizing the wave will "reduce its effectiveness". It does not. On the contrary, it greatly increases the square wave's effectiveness. 4 other zappers have followed The Ultimate Zapper's lead and have added a stabilized wave to their zapper. But their overall formulas are very weak so their effectiveness is still inferior to The Ultimate Zapper's.
e) Nowhere does Dr. Clark state that stabilizing the wave will increase the risk of "damage to delicate tissues". It does not. It is impossible for this to happen because tissue damage is dependent on frequency, not on the wave form.
f) It is impossible for The Ultimate Zapper's frequency to damage human tissue because its frequency of 2,500 Hertz is far below the frequency of human tissue. This is true for all zappers. Only frequencies above 1,000,000 Hertz can damage human tissues. Dr. Clark states this clearly in her books. Claiming otherwise is unscientific and irresponsible fear-mongering. There has never been a single report from any user of The Ultimate Zapper in the 13 years it has been on the market that it has caused even the slightest tissue damage. Nor has there been a single report of any other zapper causing tissue damage in all the years zappers have been available. On the contrary, the reports coming back from users of The Ultimate Zapper are extremely positive. The stabilized square wave helps create better results, along with its other special features.
Arthur Doerksen is a fear-mongerer. He has been trying to scare people out of buying The Ultimate Zapper for 13 years. In 13 years he has never, ever, provided proof for any allegation he has made against The Ultimate Zapper.
2. Arthur Doerksen states that harmonics " ... is another marketing term which has led some people to believe that harmonics are a desirable feature in a Zapper. It is a claim based on the removal of the current limiting resistance as noted above, producing a sharper waveform." Harmonics is not a marketing term. It is a principle of physics and is a by-product of the square-wave that Dr. Clark talks about extensively. She says harmonics are an important feature of the square-wave.
According to Dr. Clark's own research an important feature of the zapper is the ability of the square-wave to radiate harmonic frequencies. Harmonics multiply the effect of the primary wave. Unstabilized waves produce weak harmonics. The Ultimate Zapper's Super Stabilized square wave creates more harmonics than any other zapper, thousands of strong harmonics that help make it the most effective zapper available. Dr. Richard Loyd confirmed this fact when he did independent testing of The Ultimate Zapper in 2007.
3. Arthur Doerksen states "The idea of using a Zapper for electroporation therapy is uninformed nonsense, as the voltages involved (typically 10,000 - 100,000 volts per cm) are far too high for any home use device, much less a safe, effective Zapper designed to Dr. Clark's specifications."
This assertion is itself uninformed nonsense. It is complete and utter "prior art" bound nonsense. This means that this is merely an opinion based on the previous science that has been published in support of current patented devices. It in no way reflects the whole truth. It is true that the scientific literature regarding "prior art" talks about high voltage Electroporation. But that does not exclude the Electroporation effect of low voltage devices. There is no proof anywhere that low voltage devices cannot produce the Electroporation effect. On the contary. They can. The Ultimate Zapper is undeniable proof of this. Undeniable except for Arthur Doerksen because this comes from his major competitor. The Ultimate Zapper is the only non-patented zapper in the world that provides proof for its Electroporation effect on the Electroporation Page on this site along with Electroporation testimonials. Many people, including me, have felt the powerful effects of Elctroporation Therapy delivered by The Ultimate Zapper. I document many of their cases on the Electroporation Page. This is one reason that the authorities are very vigilant about the progress being made by non-patented square-wave devices. They do not want an inexpensive method of providing Electroporation Therapy to get into the hands of the public.
4. Arthur Doerksen states "We purposely do not include an AC adapter because the potential for catastrophic failure and electric shock would undo all the good we are accomplishing with the Zapper."
This is complete and utter nonsense. For years I have had a section on my Auto-Zap Page devoted to this excellent example of Arthur Doerksen's fear-mongering. He has been trying to foist this myth on potential zapper buyers for years. Surprise, surprise, he has never replied to this section on my site, nor has he replied to #8 on the FAQ Page which also resoundingly refutes Arthur Doerksen's Big Lie about The Ultimate Zapper's AC adapter. #8 also includes a refutation of this lie by an electrical engineer that was posted on Curezone.com.
The Ultimate Zapper was the first zapper in the world to offer an AC adapter. Four other leading zapper makers have followed the The Ultimate Zapper's lead and now offer an AC adapter. In 13 years, after thousands of sales, there has never been a single incident around The Ultimate Zapper's AC adapter or any other zapper maker's AC adapter, for that matter.
6. HARMONIC QUAD
The Harmonic Quad is called a multiple frequency zapper by its maker, James Overman. But purchasers of the Quad face the same problems as those who buy any digital zapper including the Dr. Clark Research Association Super Deluxe "zapper", above, because the Quad is really a digital frequency generator, not a zapper. And The Charts show the Quad has only 4 of 11 features that make zappers effective, for twice the price of The Ultimate Zapper. The Quad site has 2 testimonials that testify to its effectiveness. My site has 300 testimonials.
MEDICAL CLAIMS
James Overman's headline says the Quad "kills most invaders in less than 3 minutes" but the details say: "muscle test for the required time or zap for 30 minutes". Muscle test? How many people know how to do accurate muscle testing? The result is that most customers who buy the Quad have to zap 4 times longer than with The Ultimate Zapper because it has 4 different frequencies. However there is no proof anywhere, on any zapper site, including the Quad site, that you will get better results if you zap at 2 or 4 or more frequencies separately than if you zap at 1 low frequency only. Many people who zap with The Ultimate Zapper for only 1 to 3 minutes get truly amazing results within 24 hours. The Ultimate Zapper features the 1 low frequency of 2,500 Hertz. However, guaranteeing everyone will obtain such fast results is not only impossible it is also irresponsible, as well as illegal. Everyone is different. Besides making the misleading statements about the Quad producing harmonics and killing just about everything in sight in 3 minutes, the Quad site makes many categorical health claims without any supporting proof or testimonials whatsoever.
HARMONICS
James Overman claims that the Quad's 4 frequencies "work together to form thousands of harmonics that cover the whole frequency range of the targeted parasitic organisms." But, according to James Overman's friend, Dr. Howard May, the Quad "is not a true harmonic generator ... it is a digital multiple frequency generator ... and digital equipment does not produce any harmonics." In fact, there is no proof at all on the Quad site that it produces any harmonics whatsoever. This is an unsubstantiated marketing claim made by James Overman. Dr. Loyd confirmed The Ultimate Zapper's superior harmonics when he did independent testing in 2007.
It is also interesting to note that there is no photo of the Quad's "composite" wave on James Overman's site and no list of the Quad's specifications, although he touts the Quad highly. The fact is that the Quad offers only 4 of the 11 features that The Ultimate Zapper offers as The Charts clearly show.
CREDIBILITY
James Overman claims he has "identified & eliminated the parasites in over 17,000 people in the last 7 years". This defies credibility because my calculator shows that means working with 7 new people every day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. It takes time to test people, to identify parasites, to verify parasite elimination and to communicate with each person during the whole process. Sorry, there are not enough hours in the day to do everything James Overman claims to have done as well as go shopping, eat, sleep and relax a bit. I work 10 to 12 hours a day, 7 days a week, 365 days a year. I have not had a day off in over 8 years. Over the past 13 years I have helped thousands of people, but not 14,000 people, with the help of The Ultimate Zapper and My Recovery Protocol.
7. TERMINATOR II
The Terminator II from Don Croft looks like it has some impressive features but The Charts show it has only 1 of the 11 features that make zappers effective, its single low frequency. Read what 2 practitioners have to say about the Terminator II's effectiveness.
TESTIMONIALS
"Hi Ken, ... I bought 6 Terminators from Croft and gave them to patients and friends to try. Feedback was "no noticeable results, no improvement, nada nada ..." so I was very disappointed ..."
Aloha, Allen and Sharie, Mar. 4, 2007"Dear Ken, I am interested in your zappers as well as in becoming a distributor ... I would like to start with 3 to begin with. I have used the Croft Terminator zapper with absolutely no benefits at all, and eventually had to return it ... "
Thanks and best wishes, Imran R., May 19, 2007
CREDIBILITY
Don Croft defies credibility: "... everyone ... who has said they've got extreme sensitivity to all metals against the skin has told us later that they could wear the Terminator without getting any unpleasant skin reactions at all." This defies credibility because a major Terminator distributor says this on his own site : "If your Terminator Zapper starts to sting, itch or zap your skin you MUST move it elsewhere as it can burn through the skin."
I have received many emails from people who have been seriously burned by the Terminator II. No wonder Don Croft does not have a trial offer and does not publish warranty information. Many people have reported to me that he does not answer his emails. I discuss Don Croft's misleading claims and deceptive marketing practices on This Page.
8. SILVER TERMINATOR
The Ultimate Zapper vs. Beck Electrifier
Educate yourself about Ken Adachi. On his "Educate-Yourself" site Ken Adachi distorts statements on my site and attacks me personally. Let's examine Ken Adachi's diatribe line by line. Once you walk through this with me it will be hard not to come to the same conclusion as many others, that Ken Adachi's so-called "educational site" is produced by a "malicious liar" to promote the sale of his Silver Terminator and a miriad of other products. I will soon be posting more information regarding others who have strongly rebutted Ken Adachi.
The "educational" information Ken Adachi posted on his site in February of 2009 about The Ultimate Zapper and me was in response to a message he allegedly received on his "forum" from a person named "Jack" whose response to Ken Adachi's email never appeared on the "forum". In lieu of "Jack's" response to Ken Adachi's comments, here are my comments.
Ken Adachi:
1. "There are many web sites that sell a single frequency zapping device. The one you got is based on a 2500Hz frequency. It is based on the original design of Dr. Hulda Clark, but Ken Presner (http://zap.intergate.ca/) "improved" it by changing the duty cycle to about 90% (even though he ERRONEOUSLY claims that it's 100%)."
Ken Presner:
a) You will note that he puts the word improved in quotation marks, implying that The Ultimate Zapper is not an enormous improvement over the original Dr. Hulda Clark Zapper. A look at the Comparison Charts on my site show very clearly that not only is The Utlimate Zapper head and shoulders above the Dr. Clark A-6 Zapper it is also head and shoulders above Ken Adachi's Mini Silver Terminator which is a Terminator Imitator and all of the other 23 popular zappers on the market.
b) You will not that he falsely states that the "improved" (in his quotation marks) zapper that I have created was improved by changing the Duty Cycle to about 90%. This is totally false. The 90% Duty Cycle is only one of the features in The Ultimate Zapper's unique 11-feature formula that has "improved" it over the Dr. Clark zapper.
c) You will note the negative and pejorative tone of his posting. Here is a clear lie: "he ERRONEOUSLY claims it's 100%". I claim no such thing. In fact, if you read the front page of my site where I discuss the Duty Cycle I state very clearly that the Duty Cycle is "near 100%" and the oscilloscope views show this clearly. There is no such thing as a 100% Duty Cycle and I nowhere state that The Ultimate Zapper produces a 100% Duty Cycle.
d) What it all boils down to is that Ken Adachi's false statement about The Ultimate Zapper's near 100% Duty Cycle is a red herring designed to distract from the scientific evidence, presented on my site, that clearly shows that a Duty Cycle above 88% produces superior therapeutic results. Combined with the other 10 features in its unique formula this puts The Ultimate Zapper head and shoulders above all the other zappers on the market, including Ken Adachi's own zapper. The Charts show that his Silver Terminator has only 3 of the 11 features that make zappers effective. He offers no warranty at all, only a 30-day trial, and the cheapest model he sells requires a minimum "donation" of $280. I discuss the legal aspects of his "donation" payment system in #8 below.
Ken Adachi:
2. "It is not the "Ultimate Zapper" as Ken Presner claims. There are many things that he says on his web site that are either not true, or are distortions of the truth, or are misleading statements."
Ken Presner:
a) This authoritative statement by Ken Adachi is patently false as I clearly prove on the front page of my site, in the Comparison Charts and as the satisfied users of The Ultimate Zapper corroborate in 250 testimonials in The Archive, with more to come.
b) Ken Adachi states "there are many things he [Ken Presner] says on his web site that are either not true, or are distortions of the truth, or are misleading." So, where are the details to back up these serious accusations? Nowhere to be found. If you make a serious accusations either back them up or shut up. He does neither. He simply slings mud over the fence and runs for cover. My site comprises nearly 20 megabytes. It is the largest zapper website in the world, a work in progress that I have maintained since 1996. I document my site meticulously, especially the statements I make about The Ultimate Zapper for visitors to my site. Ken Adachi is a purveyor of deliberate misinformation. He is a malicious liar. He has a large ax to grind and he is very serious about grinding it. His so-called educational site is a front for selling his own Terminator Imitator zapper "offered" by Don Croft who created the Terminator.
Ken Adachi:
3. "He leaves you with the impression that his zapper will produce the same bio electrification results that Beck achieved to neutralize HIV. That is NOT true.. He even references the Kaali experiments at the Albert Einstein NYC College of Medicine that Bob Beck based his research on! Beck's design is FUNDAMENTALLY different in waveform, frequency, method of application and RESULTS."
Ken Presner:
a) It is absolutely true that The Ultimate Zapper will produce the same bio electrification results that Beck achieved to neutralize HIV. This is proven by many testimonials in the archive under the category BLOOD. It is clear to see The Ultimate Zapper has successfully treated many blood conditions including HIV, malaria and Lyme disease.
b) I reference the Kaali experiments because they were seminal research work. Nowhere do I state or even infer on my site that The Ultimate Zapper achieves its blood electrification results using the same principles as Robert Beck's device. On the contrary, The Ultimate Zapper and the Beck device work on entirely different principles. But they do in fact achieve the same results. Ken Adachi seems to be saying that only the Beck device is capable of producing blood electrification. This is a false claim for which he provides absolutely no proof, except his "negative proof" -- a failed attempt to debunk The Ultimate Zapper's effectiveness for blood electrification. This attempt to debunk has clearly failed because is has been resoundingly refuted by the experience of those wo have used The Ultimate Zapper for blood electrification and have achieved amazing results which are reported word-for-word in the testimonial archive on this site..
Ken Adachi:
4. "Many of the things that Ken Presner says may be true, but many things he says are also misleading and some are not accurate at all. Many of his statements are utterly specious and designed to make you believe that his zapper is the Be All and End All of zappers. He's a hype-ster of the First Magnitude."
Ken Presner:
After calling me a liar Ken Adachi then gives me credit for telling the truth but, in typical fashion, refuses to provide any details or specifics. So, the reader is left to imagine what I am telling the truth about, according to the authoritative Ken Adachi, and what exactly are those alleged "distortions", those statements that are "not true", those statements that are "not accurate", those statements that are "specious", those "misleading statements" and those statements "designed to make you believe that his zapper is the Be All and End All of zappers". Ken Adachi tops it all off by stating that I am a "hype-ster of the First Magnitude". Well, let me say this about Ken Adachi. He has the courage to sling mud at many people on his website, including me, and then runs for cover like the coward that he is without providing any details, any proof or any evidence whatsoever for the preposterous accusations that are obviously self-serving. As I pointed out, above, his so-called educational site is a front for selling his own Terminator Imitator zapper "offered" by Don Croft who created the Terminator. Ken Adachi is a malicious liar. But he is not the only zapper maker who lies about The Ultimate Zapper. David Etheredge of ParaZapper, Arthur Doerksen or Auto-Zap and David Amrein of Dr. Clark Research Association (not affiliated with Dr. Hulda Clark) all have published lies about The Ultimate Zapper. I discuss all of these issues in detail on my site on the Competition 1 and Competition 2 pages as well as this page.
Ken Adachi:
5. "Presner's claims of success are based on Hulda Clark's pioneering research, not his. He seems to want to take far more credit than he deserves. He's mainly interested in MARKETING and selling his zapper. He's OVERSTATING and hype-ing the capabilities of that zapper to the nth degree."
Ken Presner:
a) These are not claims of success. They are reports of success by users of The Ultimate Zapper. I do not hype these reports. On the contrary, I am overwhelmed and amazed by so many of them and, as a consequence, I tend to understate them, wary of the fact that unscrupulous competitors might take the opportunity of criticizing these reported results. Which they do. But in so doing they are actually criticizing my customers as well as me. In fact, David Etheredge of ParaZapper has stated that I made up the 250 testimonials on my site. When I replied with outrage on Curezone to his preposterous statements he began to backtrack. Typical of cowards, when you stand up to them with the facts and do not back down they cower away, tail between their legs. Ken Adachi is not only a malicious liar he is also a consummate coward.
b) I take credit for inventing The Ultimate Zapper, which is correct. Otherwise, who else should take credit for it? I am very glad when people get good results with it. I feel happy to do good work that helps people. One of the first things I state on my site it that I was "inspired by Dr. Hulda Clark" and there is a direct link to the Dr. Clark Page on my site where I pay tribute to her. Where do I say on my site, as Ken Adachi states, that The Ultimate Zapper is not based on the original Dr. Hulda Clark Zapper? Nowhere do I state this on my site and nowhere do I even imply this on my site. This is a lie created by Ken Adachi. How much credit do I deserve? Is seems that Ken Adachi has figured out that I "seem to want to take far more credit" than I deserve, which implies that I do deserve some credit, according to Mr. Adachi. He first creates a completely false issue then takes the opportunity to exploit it to his advantage. A typical tactic of a complete coward.
c) Next, he purports to know what I am "mainly interested in". Which is nothing good, of course. According to Ken Adachi I am mainly interested in, "MARKETING". Who is not interested in marketing who has a product to sell? Is marketing a crime? It sounds like it when you read Ken Adachi's authoritative "educational" site. My site comprises nearly 20 megabytes with over 30 pages (many of which run to over 200 book pages) devoted exclusively to health-related matters. It seems that Ken Adachis is implying that I should have an "educational" website like he has and pretend I am not using my site to sell my zapper, like he does with his Mini Silver Terminator, the Terminator Imitator. On my site I market (OK, I have admitted it) The Ultimate Zapper, footpads, a universal AC adapter for overseas orders, 3 e-books and one e-booklet. Ken Adachi's "improved" Terminator is a 3-feature zapper that costs over $100 more than The Ultimate Zapper. He markets his zapper and dozens of "packages" and add-ons on his site, many of which run into the hundreds of dollars for a single item. Ken Adachi wants us to believe that he is not "interested in" marketing, it is Ken Presner who has acquired this awful "interest". After looking at the matter, who does it appear is more "interested in" marketing, Ken Presner or Ken Adachi? You be the judge.
d) Ken Adachi states "He's OVERSTATING and hype-ing the capabilities of that zapper [The Ultimate Zapper] to the nth degree. " Well, I think I pretty well covered this one above.
Ken Adachi:
6. The Ultimate Zapper will do what a positive offset, 90% duty cycle, pulsing DC square wave will do running at 2500Hz, but it CAN'T reproduce the same results as the Beck electrifier because it's FUNDAMENTALLY different and not the same design at all.
Ken Presner:
Now, what the heck does that mean? "... will do ... what [it] will do ..."? This is mumbo-jumbo talk. Of course, The Ultimate Zapper does what it does. But Ken Adachi doesn't like what it does -- electrify the blood. As I discussed, above, The Ultimate Zapper produces the same effects as the Beck device using a different principle. The Ultimate Zapper does what Ken Adachi authoritatively insists that it CAN'T do -- produce the same results as the Beck electrifier. By the way, did you notice how he loves to use CAPITAL LETTERS? He does the SAME THING in his emails to me which are posted here.
Ken Adachi:
7. Beck's positive clinical trial results (involving THOUSANDS of people WITH AIDS) were based on using the BECK ELECTRIFIER and NOT based on Ken Presner's adulterated version of a Clark zapper that he decided to hype as the "Ultimate Zapper."
Ken Presner:
This is a totally illogical statement. Did I state the Beck clinical trials were based on The Ultimate Zapper's formula? Did I question their validity? Who said that the clinical trial results were based on my "adulterated version" [not improved but "adulterated", please note the pejorative language Ken Adachi uses] of "a Clark zapper"? Not me? Nowhere do I say or imply this. Ken Adachi made this statement. This is another paper tiger created by him which gives him the opportunity to lampoon The Ultimate Zapper, once again. The coward. There have been no clinical trials in support of the Blood Electrification effect of The Ultimate Zapper. I never state or imply that anywhere on my site. The evidence in support of this effect is empirical and I state this very clearly on my site. Empircal evidence fo the Blood Electrifcation effect does not make it any less valid. It proves the Blood Electrification properties of The Ultimate Zapper incontrovertibly. It is my customers who are verifying this. Is Ken Adachi calling my customers liars as David Etheredge did by denying the very truthfulness of their testimonials?
Ken Adachi:
8. Caveat emptor.
Ken Presner:
a) Caveat emptor, indeed. Yes, the buyer should be well aware Ken Adachi maintains a false "educational" site that he uses to denigrate others in order to "educate" his readers while encouraging them to purchase his products. Educate yourself about Ken Adachi. At the core of Ken Adachi's "Educate-Yourself" site is conflict of interest. No, Ken Adachi is not performing a public service as he wants everyone to believe. He creates the impression or being an educator to hide the fact that he is really a salesman.
b) Oh, by the way, before I forget to mention it, a small detail regarding the tax status of Ken Adachi. Ken Adachi pays no income tax on the revenue he receives from the sale of his products. He says on his site that he does not do "commerce". Selling Terminator Imitators is not a commercial enterprise, according to Ken Adachi, because he does not charge for his zappers. This is very nice of him, as well as very convenient. Are his zappers and other products free? Well, not exactly. He demands "minimum donations" for them. Donations are not subject to income tax. This may be to the chagrin of Uncle Sam and many people who visit his site to become "educated" and who who pay income tax on their own earnings, including the money they earned to purchase his Silver Terminator. Ken Adachi's deceptive business practices are typical of the way Ken Adachi runs his website. In the real world this practice is known as tax evasion because the intent is clearly to evade paying taxes using a false "educational" site as a front, not to run a legitmately educational non-profit enterprise. But in Ken Adachi's world tax evasion is business, as usual. Or should I say non-business as usual. Caveat emptor, indeed.
c) Ken Adachi's site, as has been noted by others, is comprised of pages taken from other websites to create the impression of an "educational" site. The only pages that are not plagiarized from others are those disinformation pages where he attacks others, including me, and the pages that market his zapper. Caveat emptor, indeed.
d) I sent Ken Adachi this message on the contact form on
his site on March 17, 2009:
Dear Ken,
You can read my reply at
http://zap.intergate.ca/root.html
You are as insulting and as negative as you wish to be about those you talk about
on your site but your "forum" instructions specify that "Insulting or negative email
is not welcome." I find it very interesting that you do not abide by the same rules
that you demand others abide by on your so-called forum. I think you should look
up the definition of the word hypocrite.
Sincerely,
Ken Presner http://zap.intergate.ca
MORE COMMENTS
Click here to read the complete exchange of emails with Ken Adachi including additional relevant comments.
9. CUREZONE FORUM
ADMITS CORRUPTION
I no longer post to Curezone because it has finally admitted what I have long maintained, that it is corrupt. The forum has always pretended that it is a non-commercial forum. Its rules forbid using the forum for commercial purposes, yet it has always allowed David Etheredge of ParaZapper to flaunt the rules. He has taken advantage of this privilege for many years. This privilege was granted to him alone. To test the forum's rules I started to talk about The Ultimate Zapper's merits on the forum. I was denounced by forum participants and the forum's moderator for using the forum for commercial purposes. David Etheredge has been denounced by only me and "Darkgatherer" for using the forum for commercial purposes. The conspiracy of silence surrounding David Etheredge and his promotion of ParaZapper on the forum reveals the hypocricy of both the forum's moderator and David Etheredge. My attempts to expose this hypocricy have been met not only by silence when no other effective alternative was left to the forum's moderator and David Etheredge in the face of my direct comments, but also by a combination of derision and bald-faced lies on their part (for example, David Etheredge's preposterous claim that I made up the testimonials on my site).
I not that the forum posting where David Etheredge, admits that the forum's rules
have been "relaxed" for him so that he can use it for commercial purposes has conveniently
been removed from the forum by the forum's moderator. Here is an excerpt of my final
posting to Curezone.
From http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1215514
" ... I note the rules have been "relaxed" for you [ParaZapper] on the Zapper Support
Forum, according to you. How convenient, which explains the refusal of the rules
committee to respond directly to my questions about this recently. So much for honesty
... just be helpful enough and you can join the second tier, the upper class of
the forum. Thanks, but no thanks. I won't play that game. I leave that sort of things
to others ... To quote Rett Butler, "Frankly my dear, I don't give a damn" ... I
am just glad that the truth finally came out, which was obvious before you made
the admission [that you have been given preferential treatment on the forum by being
allowed to use it for commercial purposes]. I don't aspire to being a "sound bite
helper", chasing ambulances on the forum to rustle up a bit of business, saying
anything to put down the competition, anything at all to try to influence the gullible,
trying to manipulate people to make a few extra sales. No, I don't need that and
I don't want that ... David Etheredge [ParaZapper] ... the person who benefits more
than any other person commercially from the forum, has to bring the news about duplicity
to me [rather than the rules committee or the forum moderator to whom I addressed
my questions about the rules]? Forget it. I need the forum like a hole in the head.
With that kind of dishonesty going on I won't be posting to the forum again ...
"
Try playing this game with Google. Let me know how it works out.
Here is the link to my original posting requesting clarification of the forum's rules:
http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1207083;
When my posting was not answered I followed up with this posting:
http://curezone.com/forums/fm.asp?i=1210584
Read about my step-by-step program for detoxification and revitalizing the immune system in My Recovery Protocol.
TRIAL OFFER |
kenpresner
|
ORDER HERE |
MAIN MENU
-
- kenpresner
@hotmail.com - Ordering
- Trial Offer
- Distributors & Referrals
- Instructions
- Comparison Charts
- Testimonials
- My Recovery Protocol
- FAQ