FAQ ORDER TRIAL TESTIMONIALS MANUAL

index

TERMINATOR
MINI SILVER TERMINATOR
LONGEVITY ZAPPER
DR. CLARK RESEARCH ASSOCIATION
PARAZAPPER
AUTOZAP

Terminator

Terminator and its clones -- Longevity & Mini Silver Terminator -- recommend wearing their devices for hours. That's because they're weak -- as the Comparison Charts show. The short signal path between coins means a strong effect only between the coins & a weak effect through the rest of the body, with further weakening from battery discharge.

And the coin electrodes cause burns that Terminator and Longevity warn about in the fine print. They say to move their devices around to avoid burns. But since that's not possible at night many wake up with burns.

"This picture [of a Terminator burn -- posted to an Internet forum]
was taken almost two years ago and the scars have now faded but I think
they will stay somewhat permanently cause I can still easily see them."

From the same forum: "The problem with any zapper that uses attached pennies as electrodes is that it tends to burn holes in the users skin, causing permanent scars. Lena, myself and my mother (she fell asleep on it) all have holes burned into our skin and consequently scars from the Terminator."

Don Croft claims Terminator "rids the body of heavy metals". He provides no proof -- because there is none. This is blatantly dishonest because Zappers do not chelate metals. And this applies to all zappers, including The Ultimate Zapper. But The Ultimate Zapper is unique in creating a powerful Electroporation Effect which greatly enhances the effect of chelators. It is the only zapper in the world that is proved to accomplish this amazing effect. See My Recovery Protocol for the details.

Don Croft's claim of detoxifying metals is ironic. The bare coins actually cause copper toxicity -- which suppresses the immune system. Same for Longevity & Mini Silver Terminator. The Ultimate has no burn or toxicity risk since handholds and footpads are always covered.

Mini Silver Terminator

Everyone should educate themselves about Educate-Yourself -- the site where that sells a Terminator clone -- Mini Silver Terminator. Because Peter Boudreau's "educational" site is not what it appears to be. It is actually a disinformation front. He is a liar-for-hire who has slandered many sites, including mine. He is a paid disinformer who uses an alias to hide his true identity. He has been exposed as a total fraud.


Welcome to Educate-Yourself
I'm (not the real) Ken Adachi ... how can I help (disinform) you?

If Peter Boudreau used his real name it would be easy for people to track him down and take legal action. So, he "borrowed" the name Ken Adachi from the deceased Canadian poet to hide behind a false identity. He also tries to evade pursuers by changing his address frequently.


Peter Boudreau
SHOUTING IN CAPITALS

And when he gets excited Peter Boudreau shouts IN CAPITALS. Which is good since lower case is not very effective for GETTING ATTENTION -- which I imagine is what he wanted when he called me "pathological". But I consider myself fortunate. Since he is not a licenced practitioner he was able to provide this diagnosis free of charge.

Help
I received this email -- asking for help.

Hello, This man, this "Ken Adachi," has, in retaliation, put up a libelous page about me, because I called him out on his antisemitism and his lies in a private email. The page has all of my contact information and a reading list supposedly recommended by me of antisemitic reading material. I have repeatedly asked him to remove it. To date, he has only removed the photos, only because I complained to his web host, Lunar Pages. If you can suggest a way I might be able to get him to remove this libelous page, I would greatly appreciate it. Thank you very much. Solange S., Aug 28, 2015

Longevity Zapper

David Wolfe is a fantastic health "guru". He's even into infomercials. He has a zillion followers and a loooong list of products that will keep you young pretty much forever -- as long as you keep ordering. I was in the health food business when David Wolfe was a toddler. Super Foods were popular back then. But we didn't call them Super Foods or make fantastic claims.


David Wolfe's ... Magic Mushrooms

Never mind ... David Wolfe has stock to move. But what he really enjoys is inventing things off the top of his head. Like in this video where "chocolate lines up planetarily with the sun" & "mushroom spores ... get sling-shottted right off the center of the sun and eventually right across the galaxy".

Pulling the Wool

I know a lot about chocolate and mushrooms. But, after listening to David Wolfe, I must admit I don't know as much as I thought. But it kind of feels like someone is trying to pull the wool over my eyes. Know what I mean?


Looks like someone familiar
is pulling the wool

Never mind. Once we understand how knowledgeable David Wolfe really is we'll be on the right track. He obviously labored long and hard to create his Longevity zapper -- didn't he? Actually ... nope. He knows zip-dee-do about electronics. He had to hire a technician but a Terminator clone was the best he could do. So, no surprise -- Longevity is as weak as Terminator, and has the same burn warnings.

deceptive
David Wolfe pontificating about zip-dee-do
... how about a big round of applause

Electronics 101

Ironically, David Wolfe never mentions that the copper coins on his zapper box produce copper toxicity and that this actually suppresses the immune system. But he does warn about burns from the coins -- in the fine print where you will need a magnifying glass to be able to read it.

But he knows how to entertain a crowd even when he gets it all wrong. Who needs the facts when you get the laughs -- and the check? David Wolfe needs Electronics 101. Watch as he Fudges It and Wings It in 2 videos.

deceptive

With a straight face -- off the top of his head -- he says Longevity's wave "is the tightest square wave ever produced by any zapper ever." There is no such thing as a tight wave. Then he declares "The square wave here is too tight. The electronics are too tight". There is no such thing as tight electronics. He talks about an "up-down wave". There is no such thing. He says the wave turns "on and off". No such thing. He says his zapper is "computer-controlled". No such thing.

David Wolfe says his zapper has a "positive charge". Zappers produce negative ions. He talks about a "dispersed" battery. Batteries do not disperse -- they discharge. Well ... he has totally proved he knows zippo about electronics. His audience response shows they have no idea what hit them. He gets away with it since he knows they are as unsavvy as he is.

Never mind. He may need Electronics 101 but you can still buy Longevity with confidence since there is a limited 30-day warranty with no free trial and lots of fine print. Actually, David Wolfe doesn't seem to have much confidence in his outsourced Longevity. This is totally understandable since it is the weakest in the Comparison Charts. So, it should really be no surprise that it has zero testimonials.


Homer Wolfe actually figured out
the on/off switch
A very unique situation

Never mind. David Wolfe's interest in health is already iconic. Did you know his parents are medical doctors? "Well, I started out as a son of two medical doctors ... I grew up inside a medical doctor's office ... I grew up in a very unique situation because of all those experiences. And that I believe is what oriented me towards natural health."

According to David Wolfe, his background had a profound effect on him. But ... there is no record of his mother being an M.D. His father, Gerald L. Wolfe, who David says is Iranian but is German was an osteopathic doctor (O.D.) convicted of medical insurance fraud totalling $2.7 million after his employee Ms. Sharon Chisholm blew the whistle in 1995. There's more.

His father's license was revoked in 2002 after he murdered Maureen Wolfe (his second wife) in cold blood in 1998 -- 2 bullets to the head in front of her two children. He was held in County Jail in lieu of $3 million bail. He eventually served 12 years in penitentiary. The prosecutor stated "Wolfe's brothers, his ex-wife and his sons from his first marriage [including David Wolfe] cleaned out the couple's home after the shooting."


"A very unique family situation"
oriented David Wolfe towards natural health

To influence how people feel about him, David Wolfe hides the truth about his parents behind a false image of happily practicing M.D.s.

Credentials

Never mind. The main thing is that he is honest about his own credentials. What about David Wolfe's credentials? Regarding his claim of having attended Oxford University, this response comes directly from the Information Compliance Unit of The University of Oxford: "The Degree Referrals Office has been unable to find any record of David Wolfe having undertaken a degree course at the University of Oxford."

Some people may begin to think David Wolfe is just an old-fashioned con artist. Never mind. That's because they haven't looked closely at his anti-aging program.

The first hurdle is 150

Longevity is OK. But the prospect of immortality makes people really sit up and listen. So, David Wolfe is turning Longevity into Immortality by charming us into believing we can live to 150 and perhaps forever via his advice -- and Longevity Warehouse products, of course. Rumor has it that his company will soon be rebranded as Immortality Warehouse.

Anyway ... the first hurdle is 150. The fact that David Wolfe is 47 with 103 years to go is no impediment to him or to those eager to believe him. Let's be realistic. 150 isn't that far off -- is it? After all, once you get to 100 you've only got 50 years to go.

David Wolfe has a great longevity plan -- and marketing scheme. But I hope he's not too upset when he discovers that God has a plan of His own that may put David Wolfe's plan on hold for a while.


I think I know why so many people follow him
... he says he's found a way to cheat death

Dr. Clark Research Association

Scientologist David Amrein greets visitors to his site in a white medical gown -- but has no medical credentials. And his Association is not an Association. It is a company and he is the sole owner. He uses Dr. Clark's name for his site and his products. Dr. Clark invented the A6 zapper in 1993 which she used for research. David Amrein calls his shop "Dr. Clark's Shop".

There's only one problem. Dr. Clark passed away in 2009. She never had a shop. In fact, she never sold zappers. Here is what she stated on her site: "There are other websites and companies using my name ... or selling products that claim to be approved by me ... I am not affiliated with, and have no control over, any other website or company ... no other website speaks for me ... I do not endorse any manufacturer ... ".

Furthermore ... David Amrein's devices are actually frequency generators. they are not zappers at all. Frequency generators require complicated and expensive smart keys and program drivers. He not only misleads people into thinking they are zappers, he says they are made "according to Dr. Hulda Clark. But Dr. Clark never mentioned anything about standards for frequency generators. She actually recommended using zappers instead.

Never mind. David Amrein finally got things sorted out -- by agreeing to a Federal Court Judgment related to fraudulent advertising & false medical claims -- then fled to Switzerland from the US. He threatened to "get to" me when I uncovered the facts -- emailing me "I want to sue you".

But he never has since you cannot sue someone for telling the truth about you. Which did not prevent him from trying to shut down my site by intimidating my Internet Service Provider. Which was actually not very smart for someone who used to boast about his high I.Q on the Internet. Frankly, honesty and integrity are higher on my list of personal attributes.


"Who says I'm not an association?"

ParaZapper

The CureZone affair

After years of posting to CureZone, David Etheredge of ParaZapper was roasted in this post.

Posted by a 3rd party -- Userx
on the CureZone forum right here

Para, attempting to always belittle every other zapper that is even brought up in discussion is a sad statement ... You always say Para is not the average ... I have seen absolutely nothing in the specs. that make it anything more than the average zapper ... there is absolutely nothing innovative about the Para products ...

It annoys me how Para comes on here and attempts to elevate his product above all others and its just sad he [is] so jealous ... Any other maker ... is immediately attacked by Para as being inferior when many ... produce the identical output. There is onthing in the design of the Para that puts it anywhere above the original Clark zapper built in a shoebox! ... ... I don't see anyone else lurking in here trying to push their products ...

Some background. To try to drum up business, David Etheredge has been posting to CureZone for over 10 years, using his commercial name (against forum regulations). No problem. They were glad to turn a blind eye after he made an appropriate donation. He eventually invited me to donate and join in. I had no idea about this and always used my own name. Anyway, I declined and quit the forum. I am not into "pay-for-play" games.

Names

After calling me a "hypster of the first magnitude" David Etheredge lamented that I "call names". But ... I merely state the truth -- that David Etheredge is an incorrigible liar and a pathetic fraud -- as the facts clearly show (below) -- and that whatever I say about The Ultimate Zapper pales in comparison with what 1000 unsolicited testimonials say.


David Etheredge calls me "a shade tree mechanic"
I am now open for business

Counting the days

The Ultimate Zapper is the #1 zapper with the best "Satisfaction Package" -- a 3-month trial + unlimited lifetime warranty. Comparison Charts prove ParaZappers are weak. So, David Etheredge has an appropriate policy: a limited warranty and a punitive trial he says is meant to scare people. I imagine a 60% return penalty after 14 days accomplishes that effectively. He says he examines postmarks and counts days. From his site: "... returned units MUST be postmarked by the 11th day or there may be additional charges of ... 60% for those that exceed 14 days".


Can you make out that postmark?

It's no surprise David Etheredge has received tepid response to his zappers over the years. He has developed a bold idea to face the challenge. Go after the #1 zapper -- The Ultimate Zapper -- whatever it takes. The result is an amazing artifice of smoke and mirrors. Let's take a look.

Thou shalt not bear false witness against thy neighbor.
Exodus 20:16

Smoke & Mirrors #1
"The Ultimate Zapper is just an ultimate zapper.
I'll try to clone it and take the name for my own."

David Etheredge has been obsessed with The Ultimate Zapper for years. He began calling it his ultimate zapper (in lower case) -- meaning The Ultimate Zapper from Ken Presner. He was implying that anyone can have an ultimate zapper -- even him. So, to prove it, he tried to clone The Ultimate Zapper. He did not succeed but decided to name his clone after The Ultimate Zapper -- calling it the UZ (in upper case). Very original.

Smoke & Mirrors #2
"It's a cheaply made hobby zapper"

David Etheredge says The Ultimate Zapper's point-to-point hard wiring is inferior and that it defines "a cheaply made hobby zapper". PCBs (printed circuit boards) look neat and pretty. Point-to-point hard wiring does not look neat and pretty. But the latter is known by experts to be more reliable and produce a superior signal.

Hard wiring is one of the secrets of The Ultimate Zapper's success -- one of its 12 True Feaetures. Here is the truth about The Ultimate Zapper's build quality. In fact, many high end audio companies use hard wiring exclusively. Hard wiring is how electronics were made before PCBs were invented. Read about the unreliability of printed circuit boards and PCB failures on WikiPedia and this blog.


This is your hobby zapper?

Have a look here at the inside of some "cheaply made" multi-thousand dollar high end audio components with the point-to-point wiring that David Etheredge says is inferior. By the way, he forgot to mention PCBs offer something special for zapper makers like him. They are cheap.

In fact, it costs much more to make The Ultimate Zapper than any zapper with a circuit board. It takes a lot more time to hand solder zappers with point-to-point wiring. The result is a failure rate of zero% and 1000s of happy customers -- and 1 competitor trying to pull the strings of those not familiar with electronics. To try to pull the wool over people's eyes, David Etheredge counts his zapper's circuits to impress people -- an attempt to distract from the fact that it is results, not circuits, that count.

Smoke & Mirrors #3
Chocolate chips?


The Ultimate Zapper's
micro-processor IC (integrated circuit)

David Etheredge declares The Ultimate Zapper is "not micro-processor based". He throws the truth about The Ultimate Zapper out the window by once again trying to mislead people who are not into electronics.

Have a look at the photo, above. What is this IC chip (integrated circuit) doing inside my zapper? If it's not a micro-processor chip then there's only one possibility. It's a chocolate chip. Which makes The Ultimate Zapper the world's first edible zapper.

Smoke & Mirrors #4
"My zapper's got that useless add-on too"

Zapper makers agree that zappers must have a square wave. But square on an oscilloscope does not mean square when the zapper is connected to the body. An unstabilized square wave becomes round on body contact. This creates diminished effectiveness. It is the squareness of the wave that makes the difference. Makers avoid talking about the stabilized wave -- except for David Etheredge who copied The Ultimate Zapper's stabilized wave.


    The Ultimate Zapper                        Unstabilized Zappers

David Etheredge has not succeeded in duplicating my zapper but he has been trying hard. When he copied my stabilized wave, his pretzel logic and ambivalence took over. He was actually saying "I've got that feature, too. But it's just a useless add-on demanded by my customers." Now, who believes he added a useless feature to his zapper for "no good reason" other than his customers were demanding it? The truth is he does not want people to believe he added a stabilized wave to his zapper

because The Ultimate Zapper is more effective thanks to it. Because that would make my zapper look good -- and that's a no-no. So, with calculated ambivalence he denied the effectiveness of the stabilized wave while adding it to his zapper. He "found" a stabilized wave isn't effective but adopted it anyway. How did he "find" this out? He has refused to say -- because he obvously cannot refute the science.

Smoke & Mirrors #5
Dippy waves -- dippy facts

David Etheredge likes to quote Dr. Clark. He states: "this [The Ultimate] zapper does NOT meet Dr. Clark's specification for positive offset ... take it to an electronics shop and have them check it under human load with an oscilloscope. It dips very negative ... " He says Dr. Clark states the negative dip "sustains pathogen life". Sounds serious.

According to David Etheredge, The Ultimate Zapper's wave doesn't kill parasites at all. It makes them grow. The only problem is that 1000 testimonials on this site clearly contradict his assertion that the dippy wave makes results impossible. It is obvious that the dip has no negative effect whatsoever on the effectiveness of The Ultimate Zapper. What's his proof? David Etheredge quotes Dr. Clark as proof. But Dr. Clark offered no proof of her own. And he offers no proof of his own. The fact is that Dr. Clark was wrong about many things. She died in 2009 from cancer -- after writing The Cure for All Cancers.

parawave

David Etheredge takes this deception one step further. He shows an oscilloscope photo on his site with the wave dipping, to try to sway opinion -- inferring that this is The Ultimate Zapper's wave. But is this really The Ultimate Zapper wave on the oscilloscope? No, it's not. He actually states in the text that this is ParaZapper's own wave! And he conveniently forgets to mention that every zapper wave has a spike -- and a dip.

David Etheredge also forgets to mention that his zapper's voltage drops way below 9 volts under load (with body contact) and continues to drop to zero as the battery discharges, unlike the constant high voltage of The Ultimate Zapper. David Etheredge likes to quote Dr. Hulda Clark. He forgot to mention she said at least 9 volts is key to optimum results. This is one thing that Dr. Clark got right.

Ironically, David Etheredge's attempt to impugn The Ultimate Zapper with the wave dip story ends with him impugning his own zapper by throwing the truth about waves and voltage out the window. This is not the first time his pretzel logic has twisted itself into a shape that circles back on him.

Smoke & Mirrors #6
Stick with your old model

Makers of "Hulda Clark zappers" use her name without her consent to sell their zappers. The Ultimate Zapper has never been marketed as a Hulda Clark Zapper. Which has not prevented David Etheredge from trying to belittle it -- by saying what? That it is not a Hulda Clark zapper! He says it is not a Hulda Clark zapper because it has extra features -- and that you have to stick with the old "Hulda Clark specifications" to be called a Hulda Clark zapper. That's like sticking with an old TV with poor picture quality because people selling old TV sets say flat screens are no good.


We should stick with the old model

Ironically, sticking with "Hulda Clark specifications" is a guarantee of a weak zapper since her specifications were weak: battery operation, high frequency, 50% Duty Cycle. Many makers are tempted to adopt new features. When they do, they opportunistically keep the name "Hulda Clark zapper" for marketing purposes although they are actually not Hulda Clark zappers anymore, according to Dr Clark's old rules that they conveniently adopt for others to follow.

Ironically, although David Etheredge calls ParaZapper a Hulda Clark zapper, it violates her one frequency at 25,000 Hz. rule. So, his ParaZapper is not a Hulda Clark zapper. Although he does not judge his own zapper by the rules he sets for others he still uses Dr. Clark's name for his zappers.

Smoke & Mirrors #7
"Electroporation? -- that's impossible"

David Etheredge says The Ultimate Zapper cannot produce Electroporation since "the science" says it's impossible. He refuses to acknowledge the Electroporation testimonials or take the Electroporation Challenge. If he did he would quickly change his mind. The Ultimate Zapper has proved "the science" very wrong. But, he will never admit this, of course because "the science" is never wrong -- and The Ultimate Zapper is never right.

Smoke & Mirrors #8
David Etheredge loves to quote CureZone

David Etheredge hopes that publishing negative things about The Ultimate Zapper will make him look good. He was glad to highlight a "report" on CureZone where an Ultimate Zapper customer claimed (this was over 10 years ago) that he never received his zapper or a refund that he demanded.

Here are the facts. The customer signed for his zapper. We have proof of deliver. He was lying on CureZone as part of a ploy to steal his zapper. He successfully stole his Ultimate Zapper -- and also received a full refund. Though this happened years ago David Etheredge has never acknowledged the truth -- and never removed this "report" from his site.

stay
Never mind the truth
Let's talk about something important

Smoke & Mirrors #9
Criminal support -- from a lover of the 1st Amendment

David Etheredge has links on his site leading to fraudulent "reports" about The Ultimate Zapper published on "complaint sites" that are actually run by known criminals. Their business is defamation and extortion. Here's how they work. They state they don't verify the truth of anything they print. They invite fraudulent "reports", copy from other sites and even write their own "reports". They make huge profits from pay-per-click ad revenue -- and from extorting money from the victims they create.

Extortion

RipOff Report is owned by "consumer advocate" Ed Magedson. He is a convicted felon with a long criminal record. His agent invited me to pay $50,000 to remove a "report" from their site. David Etheredge put links to this "report" in his smear campaign where he morphed this "report" into "reports". And he still keeps these links on his site even after I proved fraud. Very useful.


Here are mug shots of Ed Magedson
-- the felon from RipOff Report who David Etheredge loves to quote

Dead Links

After assuring everyone that these extortionists are "reliable sources", David Etheredge waited to the end of his smear before casually mentioning that some of the links on his site were actually dead. No problem. For him links are links. Dead or alive. However, these "reliable" sites never remove "reports". So what really happened here?

Fraud


Did you hear about the latest "report"?

The links were dead because of a fraud so obvious a 3-year-old could see it. The site owner who originally posted these fraudulant "reports" to his 2 sites removed them when I proved fraud. But they still remained on "untouchable sites" like RipOff Report that picked them up and copied them. David Etheredge assures us that the "untouchables" are very "reliable sources". They certainly are reliable for his purpose -- defamation. This is not the first criminal link in David Etheredge's history.

ComplaintsBoard was the site that ran the original "report" and was later scavenged by RipOff Report. The former is run out of Latvia, which means it is beyond the long arm of the law. They have a reputation for never removing "reports". But they removed this "report" from both of their sites (their mirror site is Scamfound) when I proved fraud. David Etheredge has never admitted the facts and has never removed a single "report" from his site -- even when the original perpetrators did so!

Wanted

Ed Magedson of RipOff Report is now (August 2015) on the run -- facing new criminal charges. Here is his criminal record: drug possession, assault and battery, check fraud and default judgment. He says he loves the First Amendment. I'm sure he does. It protects him when he creates reports that lead to lawsuits. This TV report calls him an Internet terrorist. This site calls him a cyber-terrorist. See this expose in the Phoenix New Times. He is Internet mafia in the shakedown business here. Ripoff Report's criminality is exposed on this dedicated blog.

A recent court battle was won against Ripoff by this website dedicated to exposing Ed Magedson's sociopathic business practices including fraud, defamation and extortion. How can Ripoff continue to mock the law? They are enabled by Google that profits from ad revenue generated by Ripoff. And how about David Etheredge in the face of all these facts? He doesn't worry about criminals. He simply tries to figure out how to benefit from their hard work.

Scam Sites

Scamchasers is a scam. Scaminformer is a scam. Scamtracers is a scam. ComplaintsBoard is a scam. Scamfound is its scam mirror site. Merareview is a scam run from India. These scam sites do the dirty work. David Etheredge just quotes them. Read more about him and his friends.

Smoke & Mirrors #10
Criminal support -- from a folk hero

David Etheredge has stated My Recovery Protocol that has helped so many people is too expensive for what it offers -- at $29.95. It includes free follow-up. The fact that he hasn't read it is irrelevant, of course. In 22 years only one person has ever made a negative comment about my book -- David Etheredge.

But he says a book that includes a photo of his zapper is a buy at $99.95 -- written by Kevin Trudeau, a larcenist and convicted felon. David Etheredge characterizes him as a folk hero saving humanity -- with infomercials. He forgot to mention Trudeau spent 2 years in federal prison for credit card fraud. He also forgot to mention the website mounted by those that Trudeau defrauded. Here is smiling Kevin as he leaves a Chicago courthouse after being sentenced by Judge Gettleman -- including a $37 million fine for violating a 2004 court order related to his book. A true folk hero.

David Etheredge goes to the bottom of the barrel for criminal support to try to legitimize his agenda and help him sell his zappers. He has a habit of seeking out people who are penitentiary-grade to help his cause -- people like Ed Magedson and Kevin Trudeau. Does this tell us something important about David Etheredge? I believe it does.

Smoke & Mirrors #11
The credentials fiasco

There is no finer example of David Etheredge's duplicity and gift for disinformation than his credentials fiasco. Credentials create credibility. In my book, honesty is the most important credential of all. For 10 years David Etheredge used the title "Electrical Engineer" on his site. But the truth came out after his c.v. was made public and he was forced to admit he had been lying. He wanted everyone to believe he was an electrical engineer -- and was willing to lie about it. When he was caught out he was seen tripping over his feet with excuses for operating with false credentials.


David Etheredge ... after he was caught out

Smoke & Mirrors #12
Highly skilled

David Etheredge was caught with his trousers down when his false credentials were revealed. What was his reponse? In typical fashion, he tried to distract people, as though talking about computer programming skills & working experience makes it all OK. I am a computer programmer and I am the webmaster of this site. I find it ironic that he tries to use his computer "skills" as a diversion when it is obvious they are extremely poor -- with his website looking like an accident scene.

Smoke & Mirrors #13
Building a reputation-- based on disinformation

David Etheredge has spent years chasing The Ultimate Zapper? Why? It's an obsession with him. Instead of developing a top zapper and focusing on ethical marketing to instill confidence in people he tried to clone my zapper and take its name -- while hoping to benefit from fallout from his misinformation & disinformation campaign. Has his situation improved by using these unethical tactics? No, it has not. Has his strategy worked? No, it has not. So, why does he persist? I imagine he thinks he will eventually succeed with this.

2018 update. After 10 years of trying -- it looks like David Etheredge has finally given up trying to copy The Ultimate Zapper and take its name. He has given up all his zapper models in favor of a frequency generator he calls the MY.

An ingenious plan

Members of the CureZone forum were voicing what a lot of people felt -- that David Etheredge was in trouble with his weak Dual, as The Charts show. So, it's no surprise he has spent years on CureZone talking down others while trying to drum up business.

But he made the mistake of unwittingly declaring that The Ultimate "may be the best single frequency zapper" in the world -- which means the best according to Dr. Hulda Clark who invented the original A6 version and defined what zappers are.

So, he had a serious problem. But he managed to solve it. After endorsing The Ultimate he got to thinking -- and came up with an ingenious plan. He "adopted" its name -- while trying to clone it. Well, the work was not so easy. He became frustrated & with an abrupt sour grapes U-turn I became a "shade tree mechanic" who makes "hobby zappers". He topped it off by boldly declaring I "must have made up" the Testimonial Archive. He just can't seem to make up his mind.

David Etheredge now denies having ever endorsed The Ultimate ... after making an unequivocal and glowing public declaration -- and after taking its name and trying to copy it. No problem. Ambivalence and U-turns are all in a day's work for him.

Then came MY

All 5 Ultimate Models are still as effective as ever. I have never abandoned a single model. But when David Etheredge finally gave up his quest to copy it he abandoned all of his own models, including his Dual model, previously hyped as superior devices.

He says he found the real thing with his MY model -- which he admits is not a zapper at all but a Rife Frequency Generator. It is actually a poor cousin of Rife because of its truncated frequency list. Never mind.

But I am wondering ... if his Dual model and his other models were as great as he proclaimed, then why has he abandoned them? He doesn't explain why yesterday's supposedly remarkable devices suddenly became duds and why Frequency Generators are now the cat's meow.

Well ... David Etheredge just did another U-turn, declaring that Dr. Clark stated you can use Frequency Generators as zappers (which she never said). He doesn't explain why he needs to change MY into a zapper if it is such a great Frequency Generator. It looks like he wants to appeal to those who wish to avoid the whole MY can of worms and all of its complications.

The fact is Dr. Clark advised against using Frequency Generators precisely because they are complex, and hit-and-miss devices. It's obvious she would not have advised against them if they could actually be used as zappers.

But ... you cannot turn a Frequency Generator into a zapper any more than you can turn an apple into an orange. In any case the MY is so feature-poor it would make no difference even if you could.

To improve zapper technology you need a lot more than frequency -- which is where The Ultimate excels. In any case, you need to start by being a zapper which MY Frequency Generator definitely is not, and which The Ultimate definitely is.

Then came Pinocchio Etheredge

OK I admit it. I politely called David Etheredge a liar after he declared I "must have made up" the Testimonial Archive. But he then declared that I accuse "every other zapper maker" of lying about my site -- trying to sidestep the fact that he himself had just lied. This was ironic since he was accused on CureZone (by a 3rd party) of "... attempting to always belittle every other zapper that is even brought up in discussion".

Never mind. If David Etheredge says it then we have to assume he's telling the truth. But actually ... there are hundreds of makers and I talk about only 150 ... or maybe 50 -- or maybe it's only 37. I have a great idea. Why don't we check the facts by taking head count?

David Etheredge may need to enroll in Math 101. The truth is I talk about exactly 3 makers who do a Pinocchio -- David Etheredge, Peter Boudreau of Mini Silver Terminator and Arthur Doerksen of AutoZap. If Etheredge were only 1 out of 150 it wouldn't look so bad. But he's 1 out of only 3 ... and that doesn't look so good.

Smoke & Mirrors #14
"He made them up"


I'm sure he made up those testimonials

David Etheredge doesn't want people to read the 1000 Testimonials on my site. They make The Ultimate Zapper look too good. So, he declared they are "hype", that I must have made them up and everyone should ignore them. The fact is they are cut & pasted from unsolicited customer emails. I simply report what my customers say -- word for word. When you visit the Testimonial Archive you will see that what my customers have to say about The Ultimate Zapper is far more bold than my comments which David Etheredge says make me "a hypster of the first magnitude". In which case, I imagine those submitting testimonials for The Ultimate Zapper should be categorized as hypsters beyond the first magnitude -- including Actress Karen Allen who recovered from Lyme disease with The Ultimate Zapper.

It is not by accident that I overcame two incurable diseases. My recovery happened because the truth prevailed. The Ultimate Zapper's success is also no accident. It happened because the truth about its effectiveness prevailed. This is refected in 1000 testimonials with thousands of satisfied customers in over 60 countries. Their stories come in week after week, year after year -- including miracles -- proving what a superior zapper can do.

Without saying that the testimonials on his site are unsolicited, ParaZapper boldly declared I must have made up The Archive. He then stated ... "While we have hundreds of ParaZapper Testimonials and we will present a few to you here, we feel that testimonials are not a reliable source of information as they are one-sided ..." Wha?? Oh, I get it. He is performing a public service by restricting the number of testimonials he publishes so as not to mislead readers any more than is necessary. But why present any testimonials at all if they are unreliable? Why mislead readers if you feel what you are presenting is unreliable? The Bottom line is that he doesn't trust the word of his own customers.

Testimonials are unreliable because they are "one-sided"? Do they need to be certified by a doctor or a government agency? Is someone unreliable if they report they recovered from Lyme or cancer? On this site, actress Karen Allen reports she recovered from Lyme disease in 24 hours after using The Ultimate Zapper. Does she need "another side" before we can believe her? Do I need someone else to tell me I recovered from MS & Crohn's disease?

It is clear that ParaZapper doesn't trust the word of his own customers -- and wants it both ways. In effect, he is stating ... "We have hundreds of testimonials but we won't publish them -- sparing you the inconvenience of ignoring them since you can't see them. Just ignore the 1000 testimonials presented on a competitor's site since we've stated they are unreliable".

How good can a zapper be when it offers few testimonials and the maker goes out of his way to downplay them -- and try to discredit a competitor in the process? It's clear ParaZapper's explanation is utter nonsense, concocted to minimize the fact he has few testimonials -- while trying to discredit a competitor who has a truckload. Read about him and others in Zapperland.


David Etheredge's Testimonial Nightmare

The truth of 1000 amazing unsolicited testimonials represents David Etheredge's worst nightmare. Why did he try to clone The Ultimate Zapper while naming his zapper after it? Why does he quote fraudulent "reports" to try to discredit it? Why did he say I made up the testimonials? Why is he obsessed to the point that he even speculates about my sales figures on CureZone!? I believe the answers to these questions are clear.

David Etheredge was surely troubled by the paradox of declaring, on the one hand, that The Ultimate Zapper is a "shoddy and crude zapper" while, on the other hand, declaring it "may be the best single frequency zapper" -- with the further complication that there are obviously thousands of very satisfied users as witnessed by 1000 unsolicited testimonials vs. a mere handful of testimonials for his zappers.

So, undoubtedly after doing a lot of soul searching, he found the perfect solution to "The Testimonial Problem". He bravely declared that I made up the Testimonial Archive. After perpetrating that lie he further denigrated The Ultimate Zapper by calling it a "cheaply made hobby zapper" that uses inferior hard wiring (that is actually superior) instead of neat, green printed circuit boards.


This is our newest model -- the Rinky Dink RD1

Why would David Etheredge try to copy and take the name of a zapper he denounces and whose testimonials he is willing to go so far as to lie about? This makes no sense -- unless The Ultimate Zapper is for real. Which it is, of course. In which case, trying to clone it, take its name and denounce its testimonials makes perfect sense in David Etheredge's distorted world.


I'm sure the plot's around here somewhere

David Etheredge has his work cut out for him. But he lost the plot. The plot is to be honest or people will see through you. He calls The Ultimate Zapper "their ultimate zapper". It is not surprising that his mockery of the The Ultimate Zapper has backfired on him. What goes around comes around. Since I benefit from his lack of ethics I imagine I should thank him. David Etheredge has just one problem with the truth. He is allergic to it. There's a lot more Smoke & Mirrors where this came from about David Etheredge. Read all about it.

EMAILS ABOUT DAVID ETHEREDGE


Hi Ken,

I was going to buy the ParaZapper. I bought into the fabrications and empty claims conveyed by Mr. Etheredge. I'm really glad I found your site. I felt very confident with the level of authority and experience you presented. Thank you for helping us separate the wheat from the chaff.

Steve E.


Ken,

... I have always found it interesting that you were always a main target for some of these guys [competitors]. Parazapper in particular. I don't like to call someone names, but I spoke with the man many years ago and in my opinion he is an idiot.

Mark W.


Hi Ken,

Glad I found you. I almost got caught in the ParaZapper trap, but luckily was finally able to see through the BS. I think it was actually the constant bashing of your product that convinced me you must have something good. Can't imagine why anyone would trash talk something so much unless it posed a serious threat to them ...

Regards,
Barry D.

AutoZap

Some of my comments in this section were written
before Arthhur Doerksen passed away in February 2016.

The Ultimate is the only zapper whose name is coveted by other makers. If theirs were doing what it does they would not be looking over the fence. But when Para & AutoZap looked over the fence they realized The Ultimate is light years ahead -- and decided to cross the line.

Following David Etheredge's lead, Arthur Doerksen came up with a great idea to help boost sales of his weak AutoZap. He set about trying to hijack my site by "borrowing" its name -- using a "redirect" to divert people to his site when they searched for mine. He persisted with this for years while publishing disinformation about my site.


Arthur ... trying to get more traffic to his site

I received this email from Jeff S. on Oct. 10, 2017.

I read what you wrote about Arthur and you are right. I bought his AutoZap and this magnetic food thing and neither did anything at all. He promised a refund if they didn't work but would never reply to me when I asked several times. I even used some of my electronic [test] equipment I have here and those things were not putting out anything at all.

It did not surprise me to receive the above message. They offers no proof to back their claims for AutoZap or the Zappicator. There is none. As you see right here their claims are totally false.

The secret

Never mind. Arthur still greets visitors to his site with a smile, while declaring ... "I don't fear "the C word" any more because I've been through it twice and I finally learned the "secret". Today, I use my AutoZap 5 ... every day to remain healthy and cancer free." Sounds great. Arthur is alive and well thanks to his AutoZap.

The only thing is ... Arthur died of cancer in Feb. 2016. May he rest in peace. His son, Fraser, a programmer who designed the site, now manages it --without mentioning his father's passing -- while still claiming "a Lifetime of Wellness in 5 Minutes". Read more in Zapperland.

Fraser says his father no longer answers calls because their phone has been out ... "Our phone is currently unavailable. We're working to fix it [for over 2 years]. In the meantime please send an email instead for fastest response." Fastest response ... means that emails to Arthur also go unanswered.

I received this email from John S. on Oct 28, 2017.

I emailed the company [AutoZap] that is selling Dr. Clark's devices. As of yet, I haven't had a response. It's been a week. I had to email because their phones don't work.
So ... no phones and they don't return email ...
That doesn't give me a warm fuzzy feeling.
Waking up the immune system?

When you look closely you will see that things simply don't add up with Arthur's "wellness system". Comparison Charts prove AutoZap is weak. But Arthur claims a "lifetime of wellness in 5 minutes". His proof? Dr. Clark's theory of "waking up your immune system". But she offered no proof. There is no CD4/CD8 testing of Killer T-cells/Suppressor cells before and after zapping -- the definitive immunity test. We are asked to trust Arthur and have faith in Hulda Clark.


Killer T-cells haven't heard of AutoZap's
"Lifetime of Wellness -- in 5 minutes"

Arthur follows Dr. Clark's dictums. He now quotes her immune system theory. He used to quote her old theory about resonance. When she gave up on resonance so did he. But resonance is how pathogens are destroyed, with decades of scientific proof dating to Dr. Royal Rife in the 1930s. Dr. Rife was the great genius of electro-medicine.

Neutralizing toxins?

Arthur says Dr. Clark "found you can neutralize benzene and other toxins magnetically" with the zappicator. A bold claim. What does "neutralizing" toxins mean? And how did Dr. Clark "find" this? She doesn't say. Neither does Arthur. There is no proof at all from Dr. Clark or Arthur -- or anywhere else -- for this claim. The only thing Arthur offers is a quote from Dr. Clark.


A serious claim -- with no proof

Dr. Clark's research was flawed, as her own case shows. After making videos showing "How to Use Dr. Clark's Syncrometer to Cure Cancer", and after writing The Cure for All Advanced Cancers, Dr. Clark died of cancer in 2009. Arthur covered up the cause of her death -- until he could no longer attribute it to a "spinal cord injury". He says Dr. Clark "passed the torch" to him. I wonder what torch he means. Arthur himself died of cancer in Feb. 2016.

When you begin to understand all this you may begin to wonder what the AutoZap "wellness system" actually means. There is no scientific proof that a simple magnetic field affects toxins. And his zappicator produces a simple magnetic field, not a pulsed magnetic field or oscillating magnetic field where there is supportive research for various issues -- but none at all for neutralizing toxins.

I imagine Arthur would provide proof if he had it. But he doesn't. He says you need to trust Dr. Clark -- and buy his zapper and his zappicator. By the way, Arthur does not accept zappicator returns. His excuse is that he calls his zappicator a "personal use product". Very convenient.

Results ...

I receive lots of email from AutoZap customers about no results -- never mind "a lifetime of wellness" in 5 minutes. Why not give Arthur a call and ask him to explain things?


Dear Ken,

I had a very negative experience with [Arthur Doerksen over the phone regarding] your long article about his lies. He cannot tell me anything about the super-zappercator that he is trying to peddle and says uses magnetism and also ambiguously infers also uses compression pulses ... the device that he claims there is no free trial period on, saying that it is a personal use item.

I am trying to make an informed choice as to what brand zapper (and xtras) to spend my hard earned cash on yet he has been so dismissively arrogant towards me that I no longer want to have anything more to do with him [or his company] ... He does not like my questions about specifics, particularly of this nature, and has insulted my intelligence several times ... [Arthur] seems to me to be far too dull, disinterested and unintelligent to be an engineer ...

Best regards,
from Ian M.
June 21, 2014

The adapter ...

The Ultimate Zapper was the first zapper in the world to feature an AC adapter. See #18 on my FAQ Page to find out more about why it is totally 100% safe. In fact, other zapper makers followed my lead. The fact is that there has never been a problem with any adapter from any zapper maker in all the years. AC adapters produce safe DC voltage, like all government-approved adapters. Arthur has been trying to scare people for nearly 20 years -- scare them into buying his battery zapper. Discover more about Arthur Doerksen and his AutoZap here. And read a longer expose on other zapper makers here.

HOME PAGE

kenpresner
@hotmail.com

ORDER PAGE